Cited by 52Thyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Optimization of thyroxine replacement therapy after total or near-total thyroidectomy for benign thyroid disease

Olubowale, O, Chadwick, D R·2006·Journal of British Surgery

Abstract

Background: Total or near-total thyroidectomy is increasingly used to treat benign thyroid conditions. Lifelong treatment with thyroxine (T4) is then required, but the optimal dose is difficult to predict. This study investigated factors that might predict the ideal T4 dose, with the aim of reducing delays in achieving normal thyroid function after surgery. Methods: Data on 98 patients who underwent total or near-total thyroidectomy for benign disease were reviewed retrospectively. Patient and operative variables that might predict time to achieve normal thyroid function and optimal T4 replacement dose were examined. These data were then used to formulate an algorithm for T4 dosage, based on patient weight, that was subsequently applied prospectively to a comparable group of 27 patients. Results: The median time to achieve normal thyroid function was 14·5 (range 2–120) weeks before introduction of the algorithm, and was greater in patients needing large changes in T4 dose. In multivariate analysis, the best predictors of optimal T4 dose were bodyweight (r = 0·46, P < 0·001) and age (r = −0·32, P = 0·002). Subsequent use of a weight-related algorithm improved time to achieve normal thyroid function. Conclusion: The T4 replacement dosage after total or near-total thyroidectomy is largely influenced by bodyweight. Use of a weight-related algorithm improves patient care compared with use of standard T4 dose-titration methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bjs.5157

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olubowale, O., & Chadwick, D. R.
Affiliations
Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Chadwick, D R
Venue
Journal of British Surgery
Published
2006-01-01
Volume
93
Issue
1
Pages
57-60
ISSN
  • 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2168
OpenAlex
W1968341579
Cited by
52
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British journal of surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
thyroxine replacement, total thyroidectomy, near-total thyroidectomy, benign thyroid disease, body weight, age, postoperative hypothyroidism
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Weight, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Thyroid Diseases, Thyroidectomy, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review