The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized clinical trial of honey-impregnated dressings for venous leg ulcers
Open accessAbstract
Background: The efficacy of honey as a treatment for venous ulcers has not been evaluated, despite widespread interest. This trial aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of honey as a dressing for venous ulcers. Methods: This community-based open-label randomized trial allocated people with a venous ulcer to calcium alginate dressings impregnated with manuka honey or usual care. All participants received compression bandaging. The primary outcome was the proportion of ulcers healed after 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were: time to healing, change in ulcer area, incidence of infection, costs per healed ulcer, adverse events and quality of life. Analysis was by intention to treat. Results: Of 368 participants, 187 were randomized to honey and 181 to usual care. At 12 weeks, 104 ulcers (55·6 per cent) in the honey-treated group and 90 (49·7 per cent) in the usual care group had healed (absolute increase 5·9 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) − 4·3 to 15·7) per cent; P = 0·258). Treatment with honey was probably more expensive and associated with more adverse events (relative risk 1·3 (95 per cent c.i. 1·1 to 1·6); P = 0·013). There were no significant differences between the groups for other outcomes. Conclusion: Honey-impregnated dressings did not significantly improve venous ulcer healing at 12 weeks compared with usual care. Registration number: ISRCTN 06161544 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
(1990) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 · Cited by 15,736
Mitogenic activity and cytokine levels in non-healing and healing chronic leg ulcers
Trengove, N. J., Bielefeldt‐Ohmann, H., & Stacey, M. C. (2000) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1046/j.1524-475x.2000.00013.x · Cited by 432
Biochemical analysis of acute and chronic wound environments
Tarnuzzer, R. W., & Schultz, G. S. (1996) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1046/j.1524-475x.1996.40307.x · Cited by 372
Cited by
Traditional Therapies for Skin Wound Healing
Pereira, R. F., & Bártolo, P. J. (2016) · Advances in Wound Care · doi:10.1089/wound.2013.0506 · Cited by 531
Honey as a topical treatment for wounds
Jull, A. B., Cullum, N., Dumville, J. C., Westby, M. J., Deshpande, S., & Walker, N. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005083.pub4 · Cited by 521
Self-citationHoney for Wound Healing, Ulcers, and Burns; Data Supporting Its Use in Clinical Practice
Al-Waili, N., Salom, K., & Al-Ghamdi, A. A. (2011) · The Scientific World JOURNAL · doi:10.1100/tsw.2011.78 · Cited by 314
Oryan, A., Alemzadeh, E., & Moshiri, A. (2016) · Journal of Tissue Viability · doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2015.12.002 · Cited by 309
Antibiotics and antiseptics for venous leg ulcers
O'Meara, S., Al-Kurdi, D., Ologun, Y., Ovington, L. G., Martyn-St James, M., & Richardson, R. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003557.pub5 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Jull, A., Walker, N., Parag, V, Molan, P., & Rodgers, A.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-01-14
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-182
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2073561874
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized clinical trial of honey-impregnated dressings for venous leg ulcers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.6059
- The paper
- Jull, A., Walker, N., Parag, V, Molan, P., & Rodgers, A. (2008). Randomized clinical trial of honey-impregnated dressings for venous leg ulcers. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.