The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Staged multidisciplinary step-up management for necrotizing pancreatitis
Abstract
Background: Some 15 per cent of all patients with acute pancreatitis develop necrotizing pancreatitis, with potentially significant consequences for both patients and healthcare services. Methods: This review summarizes the latest insights into the surgical and medical management of necrotizing pancreatitis. General management strategies for the treatment of complications are discussed in relation to the stage of the disease. Results: Frequent clinical evaluation of the patient's condition remains paramount in the first 24–72 h of the disease. Liberal goal-directed fluid resuscitation and early enteral nutrition should be provided. Urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is indicated when cholangitis is suspected, but it is unclear whether this is appropriate in patients with predicted severe biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis. Antibiotic prophylaxis does not prevent infection of necrosis and antibiotics are not indicated as part of initial management. Bacteriologically confirmed infections should receive targeted antibiotics. With the more conservative approach to necrotizing pancreatitis currently advocated, fine-needle aspiration culture of pancreatic or extrapancreatic necrosis will less often lead to a change in management and is therefore indicated less frequently. Optimal treatment of infected necrotizing pancreatitis consists of a staged multidisciplinary ‘step-up’ approach. The initial step is drainage, either percutaneous or transluminal, followed by surgical or endoscopic transluminal debridement only if needed. Debridement is delayed until the acute necrotic collection has become ‘walled-off’. Conclusion: Outcome following necrotizing pancreatitis has improved substantially in recent years as a result of a shift from early surgical debridement to a staged, minimally invasive, multidisciplinary, step-up approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Banks, P. A., Bollen, T. L., Dervenis, C., Gooszen, H. G., Johnson, C. D., Sarr, M. G., Tsiotos, G. G., & Vege, S. S. (2013) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779 · Cited by 7,187
Self-citationAmerican College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis
Tenner, S., Baillie, J., DeWitt, J., & Vege, S. S. (2013) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2013.218 · Cited by 2,327
Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis
Banks, P. A., Freeman, M. L., & the Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology (2006) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00856.x · Cited by 2,050
The Epidemiology of Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer
Yadav, D., & Lowenfels, A. B. (2013) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.068 · Cited by 1,974
Van felius, I. D., Akkermans, L. M. A., Bosscha, K., Verheem, A., Harmsen, W., Visser, M. R., & Gooszen, H. G. (2003) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2982.2003.00410.x · Cited by 134
Self-citation
Cited by
Arvanitakis, M., Dumonceau, J.-M., Albert, J., Badaoui, A., Bali, M., Barthet, M., Besselink, M., Deviere, J., Oliveira Ferreira, A., Gyökeres, T., et al. (2018) · Endoscopy · doi:10.1055/a-0588-5365 · Cited by 538
Self-citationClinical practice guideline: management of acute pancreatitis
Greenberg, J. A., Hsu, J., Bawazeer, M., Marshall, J., Friedrich, J. O., Nathens, A., Coburn, N., May, G. R., Pearsall, E., & McLeod, R. S. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1503/cjs.015015 · Cited by 429
Nutrition in acute pancreatitis: a critical review
Lodewijkx, P. J., Besselink, M. G., Witteman, B. J., Schepers, N. J., Gooszen, H. G., van Santvoort, H. C., Bakker, O. J., & Pancreatitis, O. B. O. T. D. (2016) · Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1586/17474124.2016.1141048 · Cited by 67
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- da Costa, D. W., Boerma, D., van Santvoort, H. C., Horvath, K. D., Werner, J., Carter, C. R., Bollen, T. L., Gooszen, H. G., Besselink, M. G., & Bakker, O. J.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-01-01
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e65-e79
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2167533146
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 16.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.