Cited by 3Science Education and PedagogyInnovative Teaching MethodsProblem and Project Based Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CUR (E)ating a new approach to study fungal effectors and enhance undergraduate education through authentic research

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Course‐based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) integrate active, discovery‐based learning into undergraduate curricula, adding tremendous value to Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (BMB) education. There are multiple challenges in transforming a research project into a CURE, such as the readiness of students, the time commitment of the instructor, and the productivity of the research. In this article, we report a CURE course developed and offered in the University of Massachusetts Amherst BMB Department since 2018 that addresses these challenges. Our CURE focuses on fungal effectors which are proteins secreted by a destructive pathogenic fungus Fusarium oxysporum , one of the top five most devastating plant pathogens. By studying this group of proteins, students are connected to real‐world problems and participate in the search for potential solutions. A 3‐week “standard Boot Camp” is implemented to help students familiarize themselves with all basic techniques and boost their confidence. Next, molecular cloning, a versatile technique with modularity and repeatability, is used as the bedrock of the course. Our past 5 years of experience have confirmed that we have developed a novel and feasible CURE protocol. Measurable progress documented by students who took this course includes stimulated active learning and increased career trajectory to pursue hypothesis‐based research to address societal needs. In addition, data generated through the course advance ongoing lab research. Collectively, we encourage the implementation of CURE among research‐intensive faculty to provide a more inclusive research experience to undergraduate students, an important element in predicting career success.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bmb.21783

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Gordon S, 2013, Preparing college students for real‐world 2.0: towards a recipe for the ‘secret sauce, Educ Technol, 53, 12
  2. 10.1187/cbe.10-03-0044 · DOI
  3. Olson S, 2012, Engage to excel: producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: Report to the President
  4. Heemstra JM, 2017, ACS symposium series, 33
  5. 10.1002/bmb.20989 · DOI
  6. 10.1128/jmbe.00121-21 · DOI
  7. Bada D, 2015, Constructivism learning theory: a paradigm for teaching and learning, J Res Method Educ, 5, 66
  8. 10.1187/cbe.20-12-0300 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/23752696.2018.1425097 · DOI
  10. 10.1128/jmbe.v19i2.1567 · DOI
  11. 10.1187/cbe.18-09-0193 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/biosci/biv167 · DOI
  13. 10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155650 · DOI
  14. 10.1094/9780890546383.008 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/bmb.20441 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/bmb.20401 · DOI
  17. Edmondson AC, 2012, Teaming: how organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy
  18. 10.1094/MPMI-03-21-0063-R · DOI
  19. 10.1038/s41596-021-00628-9 · DOI
  20. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Dolan EL, 2021, A guide to course‐based undergraduate research: developing and implementing CUREs in the natural sciences
  23. Finley A, 2021, How college contributes ‘to’ workforce success: employer views on what matters Most

Metadata

Authors
Li, G., McWilliams, M., Rodrigues, M., Mearkle, B., Jaafar, N., Golla, V., Yu, H., Yang, H., Ayhan, D. H., Allen, K., Martínez‐Soto, D., Springer, A., & Ma, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • Biochemistry and Molecular Biology University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst Massachusetts USA
Corresponding author
Ma, Li‐Jun
Venue
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-09-13
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
6-14
ISSN
  • 1470-8175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3429
OpenAlex
W4386704434
Cited by
3
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01EY030150)
  • National Science Foundation (IOS‐165241, NSF‐RCN‐UBE 2119918)
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (2016‐68004‐24931, MAS00496)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
Keywords
course-based undergraduate research experiences, fungal effectors, Fusarium oxysporum, plant pathogenic fungi, gene cloning, undergraduate research training, active learning, student career outcomes, authentic research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review