Cited by 19Medicinal Plants and NeuroprotectionDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionHeavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity

Effects of Centella asiatica extract on antioxidant status and liver metabolome of rotenone‐treated rats using GC–MS

Intararuchikul, Thidarat, Teerapattarakan, Narudol, Rodsiri, Ratchanee, Tantisira, Mayuree, Wohlgemuth, Gert, Fiehn, Oliver, Tansawat, Rossarin·2019·Biomedical Chromatography

Abstract

Centella asiatica has been used as a culinary vegetable or medicinal herb. In this study, the hepatoprotective effect of the standardized extract of C. asiatica (ECa233) in rotenone‐treated rats was examined using a GC–MS‐based metabolomic approach. ECa233 contains >80% triterpenoids with a ratio of madecassoside to asiaticoside of 1.5(±0.5):1. Rats were randomly divided into three groups (with six rats/group): sham negative control, rotenone positive control and the ECa233 test group. Rats in the ECa233 group received 10 mg/kg ECa233 orally for 20 days, followed by 2.5 mg/kg intraperitoneal rotenone injection to induce toxicity before being sacrificed. Metabolomic analysis showed that supplementation of ECa233 protected rat liver against rotenone toxicity. Pipecolinic acid was one of the most important metabolites; its level was decreased in the rotenone group as compared with the control. Supplementation with ECa233 before administration of rotenone raised pipecolinic acid to levels intermediate between controls and rotenone alone. The metabolomics approach also helped discover a possible new genuine epimetabolite in the present work. Antioxidant tests revealed that ECa233 inhibited lipid peroxidation and increased catalase activities in liver tissue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bmc.4395

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Intararuchikul, T., Teerapattarakan, N., Rodsiri, R., Tantisira, M., Wohlgemuth, G., Fiehn, O., & Tansawat, R.
Affiliations
  • Chulalongkorn University (TH)
  • Burapha University (TH)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Corresponding author
Tansawat, Rossarin
Venue
Biomedical Chromatography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-17
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
e4395-e4395
ISSN
  • 0269-3879 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0801
OpenAlex
W2892429124
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomedical Chromatography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Korea National Institute of Health (NIH DK097154)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Keywords
Centella asiatica, hepatoprotection, rotenone toxicity, liver metabolome, antioxidant status, triterpenoids, madecassoside, asiaticoside, pipecolic acid, lipid peroxidation, catalase activity
MeSH terms
Animals, Antioxidants, Insecticides, Liver, Male, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Plant Extracts, Rotenone, Triterpenes, Rats, Wistar, Oxidative Stress, Centella, Rats, Metabolome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review