Cited by 25Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsBiomarkers in Disease Mechanisms

Association between serum NPTX2 and cognitive function in patients with vascular dementia

Open access
Shao, Keke, Shan, Shiqin, Ru, Wenwen, Ma, Cuihua·2020·Brain and Behavior

Abstract

Objective: Neuronal Pentraxin 2 (NPTX2) has recently been widely reported as a novel biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD), but its correlation with vascular dementia (VaD) has not been elucidated. This study aimed to explore the correlation between NPTX2 and the cognitive function of VaD patients. Methods: 112 VaD patients and 76 healthy controls were included in the study. Upon admission, clinical baseline data for all subjects were collected. Serum NPTX2 levels were determined using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). At the same time, the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) scale was used to measure cognitive function. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between serum NPTX2 level and the cognitive function of VaD patients. Results: Compared with healthy controls, VaD patients had lower serum NPTX2 levels (p < .001). The results of Spearman's correlation analysis showed that serum NPTX2 levels in VaD patients were positively correlated with MoCA scores (r = .347, p = .042). The results of multivariate regression analysis showed that after adjusting for common risk factors, serum NPTX2 levels in VaD patients were still significantly associated with MoCA scores (β = 0.346, p = .039). Conclusions: Serum NPTX2 level was independently associated with cognitive function in patients with VaD. Serum NPTX2 level may be a novel predictor for cognitive function in VaD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/brb3.1779

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shao, K., Shan, S., Ru, W., & Ma, C.
Affiliations
Department of Neurology Shanxian Central Hospital Heze Shandong Province China
Corresponding author
Ma, Cuihua
Venue
Brain and Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-03
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
e01779-e01779
ISSN
  • 2157-9032 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-3279
OpenAlex
W3047123115
Cited by
25
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain and Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biomarkers in Disease Mechanisms
Keywords
NPTX2, vascular dementia, cognitive function, serum biomarkers, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, dementia biomarkers
MeSH terms
Mental Status and Dementia Tests, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition, Humans, Dementia, Vascular, Biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review