The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental Requirements, Knowledge Sharing and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from the Electronics Industry in China
Abstract
Building on the Porter hypothesis, which posits that regulatory stringency triggers innovation and thereby allows firms to achieve the dual purpose of environment protection and enhanced business performance, the present research develops an integrative model that explores the determinants of green innovation with a focus being placed on knowledge sharing. Data were collected from 203 green innovation project leaders from electronics manufacturers operating in China. The results indicate that knowledge sharing mediates the relationship between green requirements and new green product success as well as that between green requirements and green product and process innovations. Interestingly, the empirical analysis rejects the hypothesized positive influence of green requirements on green product and process innovations as well as that on new green product success, while confirming that there exists a direct and positive association between green requirements and knowledge sharing. The direct positive impact of knowledge sharing is the strongest on green process innovation. This study provides a theoretical basis for investigating the possible determinants in the causal links between green requirements and green innovation success and establishes that knowledge sharing and green process innovation may be the points where leverage can be applied to best secure innovation success. Implications of the findings on environmental policy and law design are also discussed to see how the regulatory role of the government can be better positioned to facilitate compliance and innovation. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001 · Cited by 18,010
Teece, D. J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.640 · Cited by 16,825
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-5167 · Cited by 10,802
The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability
Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400403 · Cited by 7,947
The Oxford Handbook of Innovation
(2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.0001 · Cited by 5,922
A Second Generation Little Jiffy
Kaiser, H. F. (1970) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291817 · Cited by 4,785
Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299305700304 · Cited by 4,343
Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications
Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400201 · Cited by 4,107
Cited by
Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Zafar, A. U., Rehman, S. U., & Islam, T. (2020) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-11-2019-0624 · Cited by 681
Zhang, J., Liang, G., Feng, T., Yuan, C., & Jiang, W. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2349 · Cited by 499
Zhang, F., & Zhu, L. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2298 · Cited by 485
Rubel, M. R. B., Kee, D. M. H., & Rimi, N. N. (2021) · Employee Relations: The International Journal · doi:10.1108/er-04-2020-0163 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, S. K. S.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-09-18
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 321-338
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W1958251217
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 90
- FWCI
- 12.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental Requirements, Knowledge Sharing and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from the Electronics Industry in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bse.1746
- The paper
- Wong, S. K. S. (2013). Environmental Requirements, Knowledge Sharing and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from the Electronics Industry in China. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1746
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.