Cited by 681Environmental Sustainability in BusinessInnovation and Knowledge ManagementSustainability and Innovation in Business

Exploring the influence of knowledge management process on corporate sustainable performance through green innovation

Shahzad, Mohsin, Qu, Ying, Zafar, Abaid Ullah, Rehman, Saif Ur, Islam, Tahir·2020·Journal of Knowledge Management

Abstract

Purpose Enhancing green innovation for corporate sustainability is one of the recent issues globally. Knowledge management has been determined as a core factor that hamstrings green innovation. The existing literature was limited to expose the importance of the knowledge management process for corporate sustainable performance. Thus, this paper aims to examine the role of the knowledge management process for corporate sustainable performance with the integration of green innovation and organizational agility following the resource-based view theory. Design/methodology/approach Cross-sectional design was used in this study. Data were gathered through convenience sampling from 475 respondents of multinational manufacturing corporations of Pakistan, analyzed by using structural equation modeling. Findings This study revealed that the knowledge management process and its all constructs (acquisition, dissemination and application) lead toward green innovation; further, green innovation influences corporate sustainable performance and its all constructs (environment, economic and social). Green innovation partially mediates the association between the knowledge management process and corporate sustainable performance. Besides, organizational agility has a positive effect on green innovation and corporate sustainable performance but was not found moderating these relations. The study educates that organizations investing in innovative technologies and adopting greener strategies are not only adequate for achieving sustainable performance, soft issues such as knowledge management and organizational agility but also important factors in the current knowledge base economy. Originality/value This study is an attempt to examine the previously undiscovered multi-dimensional relationships among the knowledge management process, green innovation, organizational agility and corporate sustainable performance. The presence of a positive correlation among these constructs was observed, proving the conceptual framework for this study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jkm-11-2019-0624

Cites

130 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Zafar, A. U., Rehman, S. U., & Islam, T.
Affiliations
  • Dalian University of Technology (CN)
  • Lahore Garrison University (PK)
  • Tongji University (CN)
Venue
Journal of Knowledge Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2020-08-20
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
2079-2106
ISSN
1367-3270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3081116914
Cited by
681
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 109 · 2025: 161 · 2024: 169 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 3
FWCI
62.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Knowledge Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Sustainability and Innovation in Business
Keywords
knowledge management processes, green innovation, organizational agility, knowledge acquisition, knowledge dissemination, knowledge application, resource-based view

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review