The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transdisciplinarity in Corporate Sustainability: Mapping the Field
Open accessAbstract
Sustainability challenges are complex. So are the challenges that business firms encounter in their corresponding quest for corporate sustainability. Given this complexity, there is a need for new approaches to corporate sustainability management research. We discuss transdisciplinarity as such a novel approach in three steps. After showing that specialization is the primary conventional response to increasing complexity, we first briefly compare how inter‐, multi‐ and transdisciplinarity reintegrate decentralized, specialized knowledge. The second step describes how the emerging sustainability science has recently advanced the transdisciplinary methodology. Based on the two dimensions of interdisciplinarity and academia–practice collaboration, we third generate a framework for mapping existing research approaches in terms of their transdisciplinary qualities. We use this framework to identify room for novel methodologies in sustainability management research. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Action Research and Minority Problems
Lewin, K. (1946) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x · Cited by 6,554
Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.323 · Cited by 4,029
Scholz, R. W., Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Walter, A. I., & Stauffacher, M. (2006) · International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/14676370610677829 · Cited by 360
Environmental Literacy in Science and Society: From Knowledge to Decisions
Scholz, R. W. (2011) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511921520 · Cited by 332
Cited by
Seele, P., & Gatti, L. (2017) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1912 · Cited by 693
Addressing the SDGs in sustainability reports: The relationship with institutional factors
Rosati, F., & Faria, L. G. D. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.107 · Cited by 674
Upward, A., & Jones, P. (2016) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026615592933 · Cited by 512
Empowering Employee Sustainability: Perceived Organizational Support Toward the Environment
Lamm, E., Tosti-Kharas, J., & King, C. E. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2093-z · Cited by 374
Dzhengiz, T., & Niesten, E. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04360-z · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaltegger, S., Beckmann, M., & Hansen, E. G.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 219-229
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2145232397
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 32.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.