The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do Board's Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy and Orientation Influence Environmental Sustainability Disclosure? UK Evidence
Abstract
The environmental implications of corporate economic activities have led to growing demands for firms and their boards to adopt sustainable strategies and to disseminate more useful information about their activities and impacts on environment. This paper investigates the impact of board's corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategy and orientation on the quantity and quality of environmental sustainability disclosure in UK listed firms. We find that effective board CSR strategy and CSR‐oriented directors have a positive and significant impact on the quality of environmental sustainability disclosure, but not on the quantity. Our findings also suggest that the existence of a CSR committee and issuance of a stand‐alone CSR report are positively and significantly related to environmental sustainability disclosure. When we distinguish between firms with high and low environmental risk, we find that the board CSR/sustainability practices that affect the quantity (quality) of environmental sustainability disclosure appear to be driven more by highly (lowly) environmentally sensitive firms. These results suggest that the board CSR/sustainability practices play an important role in ensuring a firm's legitimacy and accountability towards stakeholders. Our findings shed new light on this under‐researched area and could be of interest to companies, policy‐makers and other stakeholders. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003 · Cited by 3,570
The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note
Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009 · Cited by 2,069
Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-10218 · Cited by 1,916
Cited by
Composition and Activity of the Board of Directors: Impact on ESG Performance in the Banking System
Birindelli, G., Dell’Atti, S., Iannuzzi, A. P., & Savioli, M. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10124699 · Cited by 459
The determinants of business contribution to the 2030 Agenda: Introducing the SDG Reporting Score
Pizzi, S., Rosati, F., & Venturelli, A. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2628 · Cited by 426
Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective
Lu, J., & Herremans, I. M. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2326 · Cited by 365
Board Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Meta-Analytic Investigation
Endrikat, J., de Villiers, C., Guenther, T. W., & Guenther, E. M. (2021) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650320930638 · Cited by 319
García‐Sánchez, I., Rodríguez‐Ariza, L., Aibar‐Guzmán, B., & Aibar‐Guzmán, C. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2485 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Helfaya, A., & Moussa, T.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-04-19
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1061-1077
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2614892361
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 50.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do Board's Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy and Orientation Influence Environmental Sustainability Disclosure? UK Evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bse.1960
- The paper
- Helfaya, A., & Moussa, T. (2017). Do Board's Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy and Orientation Influence Environmental Sustainability Disclosure? UK Evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1960
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.