The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective
Open accessAbstract
This study investigates whether gender diversity on the board of directors in the United States is associated with firms' environmental performance. Under the theoretical framework of resource dependence theory, we argue that gender diversity brings a greater variety of skills to the board. Diversity allows for a healthy mix of knowledge and experience to improve the decision‐making process of the board. Using propensity score matching and controlling for endogeneity, this study uses a more rigorous statistical model than previous work. It also uses content analysis of directors' biographies to provide evidence of the role that gender diversity plays. We find gender diversity is positively associated with firms' environmental performance scores primarily in the more environmentally impacting industries. Therefore, our research provides valuable direction for those firms working to improve both their boards' gender diversity and their environmental performance. Our findings also offer insight into the mixed results of previous studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective
Reitz, H. J., Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257794 · Cited by 9,172
A RESOURCE-BASED PERSPECTIVE ON CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND PROFITABILITY.
RUSSO, M. V., & FOUTS, P. A. (1997) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257052 · Cited by 4,805
A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm
Hart, S. L. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258963 · Cited by 4,567
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
Austin, P. C. (2011) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.433 · Cited by 3,949
Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::aid-smj101>3.0.co;2-3 · Cited by 3,801
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003 · Cited by 3,570
Resource Dependence Theory: A Review
Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309343469 · Cited by 3,178
What's the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations
Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586096 · Cited by 3,151
Cited by
Khatib, S. F. A., Abdullah, D. F., Elamer, A. A., & Abueid, R. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2665 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, J., & Herremans, I. M.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-05-31
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1449-1464
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2947302123
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 115
- FWCI
- 44.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bse.2326
- The paper
- Lu, J., & Herremans, I. M. (2019). Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2326
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.