The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green absorptive capacity: A mediation‐moderation model of knowledge for innovation
Abstract
Supported by the dynamic capabilities literature, this study examines the linkages between environmental factors, organizational factors and green innovation performance in light of the moderating effect of green absorptive capacity. Based on a sample of 78 firms in the electric power industry in Brazil, a mediation‐moderation model is proposed and tested using partial least squares structural equation modelling, which allows the analysis of both direct and indirect relationships. The results yielded general support for the study hypotheses, suggesting that (i) environmental factors have both a direct and indirect positive effect on green innovation performance, (ii) organizational factors fully mediate the effect of environmental factors on green innovation performance, and (iii) green absorptive capacity has a positive moderating impact on the mediation model. These findings provide empirical evidence of a better understanding of the antecedents of green innovation performance by highlighting the role of green absorptive capacity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991
Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630102700601 · Cited by 3,451
Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013)
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428114526928 · Cited by 3,332
An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM
Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.001 · Cited by 2,906
Schilke, O. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2099 · Cited by 1,264
A New Blueprint for a Green Economy
Barbier, E. B. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203097298 · Cited by 188
Cited by
Zhang, J., Liang, G., Feng, T., Yuan, C., & Jiang, W. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2349 · Cited by 499
Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Grybauskas, A., Vilkas, M., & Petraitė, M. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2867 · Cited by 462
Demirel, P., & Kesidou, E. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2286 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Pacheco, L. M., Alves, M. F. R., & Liboni, L. B.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-08-06
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1502-1513
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2887620448
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 18.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green absorptive capacity: A mediation‐moderation model of knowledge for innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bse.2208
- The paper
- Pacheco, L. M., Alves, M. F. R., & Liboni, L. B. (2018). Green absorptive capacity: A mediation‐moderation model of knowledge for innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
