Cited by 3,332Psychometric Methodologies and TestingStatistical Methods and ApplicationsAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models

Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013)

Open access
Henseler, Jörg, Dijkstra, Theo K., Sarstedt, Marko, Ringle, Christian M., Diamantopoulos, Adamantios, Straub, Detmar W., Ketchen, David J., Hair, Joseph F. +2 more·2014·Organizational Research Methods

Abstract

This article addresses Rönkkö and Evermann’s criticisms of the partial least squares (PLS) approach to structural equation modeling. We contend that the alleged shortcomings of PLS are not due to problems with the technique, but instead to three problems with Rönkkö and Evermann’s study: (a) the adherence to the common factor model, (b) a very limited simulation designs, and (c) overstretched generalizations of their findings. Whereas Rönkkö and Evermann claim to be dispelling myths about PLS, they have in reality created new myths that we, in turn, debunk. By examining their claims, our article contributes to reestablishing a constructive discussion of the PLS method and its properties. We show that PLS does offer advantages for exploratory research and that it is a viable estimator for composite factor models. This can pose an interesting alternative if the common factor model does not hold. Therefore, we can conclude that PLS should continue to be used as an important statistical tool for management and organizational research, as well as other social science disciplines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1094428114526928

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 111 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • University System of Georgia (US)
  • Auburn University (US)
  • Kennesaw State University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Henseler, Jörg
Venue
Organizational Research Methods
Published
2014-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
182-209
ISSN
  • 1094-4281 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7425
OpenAlex
W2100739170
Cited by
3,332
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 327 · 2025: 396 · 2024: 433 · 2023: 458 · 2022: 424 · 2021: 349 · 2020: 261 · 2019: 230 · 2018: 177 · 2017: 116 · 2016: 106 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 14 · 2012: 1
FWCI
115.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Organizational Research Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Keywords
partial least squares, structural equation modeling, common factor model, simulation study, exploratory research, methodological considerations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review