The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microfoundations of dynamic capabilities: Insights from circular economy business cases
Abstract
Circular economy is a key strategy to achieve corporate sustainability. However, so far, most firms are unable to translate the concept of circular economy into their corporate strategies, business models, and operations. Some scholars have argued that firms need to develop new (and dynamic) capabilities for circular economy implementation. Yet there is a little discussion on how firms can develop such capabilities. Notably, there is a paucity of research on specific skills, processes, and organizational activities (microfoundations of dynamic capabilities) that may facilitate circular economy implementation. To address this knowledge gap, using a multiple‐case studies approach, we explore microfoundations of dynamic capabilities in successful circular economy business cases. Our findings indicate that dynamic capabilities positively contribute to circular economy implementation. Our case studies show that case firms identified circular economy opportunities by using four microfoundations of sensing capability. Further, case firms acted on the identified opportunities by using simultaneously three microfoundations of seizing capability and four microfoundations of reconfiguring capability. This paper contributes to the literature on the relations between dynamic capabilities and corporate sustainability by providing insights on how sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring dynamic capabilities act in successful operationalization of circular economy strategies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The development of a new CBM requires experimentation capabilities at the institutional, strategic, and operational levels (Bocken and Konietzko, 2023), and dynamic capabilities for CE implementation (Khan et al., 2020), the development of circular manufacturing supply chains (Chari et al., 2022), and cross-sectoral collaboration in networks (K ¨ ohler et al., 2022).”
From Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies (2024) · cites this paper as Khan et al., 2020
Citations
Cites
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data
Langley, A. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248 · Cited by 7,008
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda
Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x · Cited by 3,152
A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy
Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2003.8925233 · Cited by 2,362
Lacy, P., & Rutqvist, J. (2015) · doi:10.1057/9781137530707 · Cited by 327
Daddi, T., Nucci, B., & Iraldo, F. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.090 · Cited by 185
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- 10.1287/orsc.1090.0423 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.06.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.103 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.035 · DOI
- 10.1108/MD-07-2018-0724 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.441 · DOI
- 10.1177/0149206309350776 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.032 · DOI
- 10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 · DOI · Paper page
- Bos‐Brouwers H. E. J., 2009, Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice, Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 417, 10.1002/bse.652 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10551-012-1422-3 · DOI
- 10.1002/csr.1719 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10668-011-9294-8 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.2015 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.002 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
- Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2013, Towards the circular economy Vol. 1: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition
- 10.3843/SusDev.15.3:6 · DOI
- 10.1177/1094428112452151 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.044 · DOI
- 10.1111/jiec.12244 · DOI
- 10.2307/258963 · DOI
- Helfat C. E., 2007, Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations
- 10.1002/bse.739 · DOI
- 10.1080/13662716.2017.1310034 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.1958 · DOI
- 10.2307/259349 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/bse.1906 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.146 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.022 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.031 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.036 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/csr.1761 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.005 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.587 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.2048 · DOI
- 10.1002/job.2186 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.640 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.047 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.318 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/EMJB-05-2013-0025 · DOI
- 10.1002/jsc.1906 · DOI
- Yin R. K., 2009, Case study research: Design and methods
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.006 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies
Minoja, M., & Romano, G. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143584 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, O., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Management Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna Pisa Italy
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-01-15
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1479-1493
- ISSN
- 0964-4733
- 1099-0836
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 8
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review