Cited by 326

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microfoundations of dynamic capabilities: Insights from circular economy business cases

Khan, Owais, Daddi, Tiberio, Iraldo, Fabio·2020·Business Strategy and the Environment

Abstract

Circular economy is a key strategy to achieve corporate sustainability. However, so far, most firms are unable to translate the concept of circular economy into their corporate strategies, business models, and operations. Some scholars have argued that firms need to develop new (and dynamic) capabilities for circular economy implementation. Yet there is a little discussion on how firms can develop such capabilities. Notably, there is a paucity of research on specific skills, processes, and organizational activities (microfoundations of dynamic capabilities) that may facilitate circular economy implementation. To address this knowledge gap, using a multiple‐case studies approach, we explore microfoundations of dynamic capabilities in successful circular economy business cases. Our findings indicate that dynamic capabilities positively contribute to circular economy implementation. Our case studies show that case firms identified circular economy opportunities by using four microfoundations of sensing capability. Further, case firms acted on the identified opportunities by using simultaneously three microfoundations of seizing capability and four microfoundations of reconfiguring capability. This paper contributes to the literature on the relations between dynamic capabilities and corporate sustainability by providing insights on how sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring dynamic capabilities act in successful operationalization of circular economy strategies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bse.2447

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1287/orsc.1090.0423 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.06.004 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.103 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.035 · DOI
  5. 10.1108/MD-07-2018-0724 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/smj.441 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/0149206309350776 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.032 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Bos‐Brouwers H. E. J., 2009, Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice, Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 417, 10.1002/bse.652 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s10551-012-1422-3 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/csr.1719 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s10668-011-9294-8 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/bse.2015 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.002 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
  18. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2013, Towards the circular economy Vol. 1: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition
  19. 10.3843/SusDev.15.3:6 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/1094428112452151 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.044 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/jiec.12244 · DOI
  23. 10.2307/258963 · DOI
  24. Helfat C. E., 2007, Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations
  25. 10.1002/bse.739 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/13662716.2017.1310034 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/bse.1958 · DOI
  28. 10.2307/259349 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1002/bse.1906 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.146 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.022 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.031 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.036 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1002/csr.1761 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.005 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/bse.587 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/bse.2048 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/job.2186 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/smj.640 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.047 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/smj.318 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1108/EMJB-05-2013-0025 · DOI
  46. 10.1002/jsc.1906 · DOI
  47. Yin R. K., 2009, Case study research: Design and methods
  48. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.006 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Khan, O., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F.
Affiliations
Institute of Management Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna Pisa Italy
Venue
Business Strategy and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01-15
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
1479-1493
ISSN
  • 0964-4733
  • 1099-0836
Cited by
326
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review