The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating environmental and stakeholder management
Open accessAbstract
Regulation has been an important instrument in pushing the business community towards improved environmental performance. However, there has also been increasing pressure from a growing number of stakeholders, including employees, customers, neighbours, NGOs etc. In order to improve corporate relationships with various stakeholders, companies need to be able to identify these stakeholders and assess their influence. The first part of this paper will discuss the relevant theory and introduce a model to analyse and identify the most significant stakeholder groups and their influence on corporate behaviour. Based on a recent survey of Danish companies, the second part of the paper will report on the success of a variety of stakeholders in forcing companies to introduce environment‐related initiatives. The results will then be discussed in light of the theory and other reported results. The paper closes with a discussion of research implications. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258887 · Cited by 5,846
Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences
Rowley, T. J. (1997) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107 · Cited by 2,522
Cited by
Roscoe, S., Subramanian, N., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Chong, T. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2277 · Cited by 1,018
Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions
Miles, S. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2741-y · Cited by 374
Environmental management control systems: The role of contextual and strategic factors
Pondeville, S., Swaen, V., & De Rongé, Y. (2013) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2013.06.007 · Cited by 275
Improving the Sustainable Development of Firms: The Role of Employees
Wolf, J. (2013) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1731 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Madsen, H., & Ulhøi, J. P.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 77-88
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W1975867111
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating environmental and stakeholder management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bse.279
- The paper
- Madsen, H., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2001). Integrating environmental and stakeholder management. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
