The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic capabilities for circular manufacturing supply chains—Exploring the role of Industry 4.0 and resilience
Abstract
An organisation's sustainability performance is influenced by its capabilities (skills, resources and competences) which in turn affects the performance of its entire supply chain. However, recent research has not sufficiently explored the convergence of dynamic capabilities, circular economy, resilience and Industry 4.0 concepts for manufacturing supply chains. Therefore, this study aims to identify how dynamic capabilities theory can enable circular and resilient supply chains. A qualitative research process was deployed in three stages: literature review, European project and nine expert interviews. Key investigative variables were used to identify capabilities used in manufacturing, and five research propositions were developed to address the gaps found in literature. The empirical data helped reveal challenges to circular economy implementation and validate the literature findings. The main contributions include a dynamic capabilities model, a causal relationship model and five research propositions for circular economy implementation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures









Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The development of a new CBM requires experimentation capabilities at the institutional, strategic, and operational levels (Bocken and Konietzko, 2023), and dynamic capabilities for CE implementation (Khan et al., 2020), the development of circular manufacturing supply chains (Chari et al., 2022), and cross-sectoral collaboration in networks (K ¨ ohler et al., 2022).”
From Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies (2024) · cites this paper as Chari et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gibbs, G. (2007) · doi:10.4135/9781849208574 · Cited by 4,299
The Significance of Saturation
Morse, J. M. (1995) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973239500500201 · Cited by 2,663
I NDUSTRIAL S YMBIOSIS : Literature and Taxonomy
Chertow, M. R. (2000) · Annual Review of Energy and the Environment · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.313 · Cited by 1,917
A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises
Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040 · Cited by 1,766
Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Jabbour, C. J. C., Godinho Filho, M., & Roubaud, D. (2018) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8 · Cited by 1,116
Change process: a key enabler for building resilient SMEs
Ates, A., & Bititci, U. (2011) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.563825 · Cited by 372
Examining the impact of cloud ERP on sustainable performance: A dynamic capability view
Gupta, S., Meissonier, R., Drave, V. A., & Roubaud, D. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.10.013 · Cited by 175
Research works printed but not linked: 118
- 10.3390/su13116501 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-62796-6_1 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.624 · DOI
- 10.1108/MD-07-2018-0724 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107844 · DOI
- 10.1108/ijoa-04-2020-2120 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120420 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104502 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00207543.2019.1661532 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.091 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00675.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.026 · DOI
- Blalock H. M., 1985, Causal models in the social sciences
- 10.2307/270941 · DOI
- Blunck E., 2017, Industry 4.0 – An opportunity to realize sustainable manufacturing and its potential for a circular economy, DIEM: Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting, 3, 644
- 10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101950 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.2614 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11213-018-9453-z · DOI
- 10.1115/MSEC2021-62394 · DOI
- Charmaz K., 2006, Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis
- 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101596 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250150910 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.emj.2019.12.004 · DOI
- Creswell J. W., 2003, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches
- Silva I. A., 2019, Paper presented at the 26th EurOMA Conference Operations Adding Value to Society
- 10.1002/bse.1932 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.130 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.349 · DOI
- Dev N. K. Shankar R. &Qaiser F. H.(2020).Industry 4.0 and circular economy: Operational excellence for sustainable reverse supply chain performance.153.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104583 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125264 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.016 · DOI
- Eamonn K, 2015, Business ecosystems come of age
- 10.1037//1082-989X.5.2.155 · DOI
- 10.1080/00207543.2021.1906971 · DOI
- 10.1162/jiec.1997.1.1.67 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
- Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2016, Intelligent assets: Unlocking the circular economy potential
- 10.7551/mitpress/8896.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105064 · DOI
- Fabbe‐Costes N., 2021, Paper presented at the Euroma, Berlin (Virtual conference)
- 10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.03.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/0272-6963(90)90098-X · DOI
- Gatenholm G., 2021, Paper presented at the Euroma, Berlin (Virtual conference)
- Gaur V. & Gaiha A. (2020).Building a transparent supply chain.Harvard Business Review Magazine(May–June 2020) 94–103.
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.015 · DOI
- Graedel T. E., 2003, Industrial ecology
- Henriques J., 2019, “SCALER”—How to create incentives for industrial symbiosis while preventing and mitigating implementation risks (Deliverable 2.3)
- 10.1002/bse.739 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.093 · DOI
- 10.14743/apem2018.3.287 · DOI
- 10.1080/13645570902996301 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/md-09-2018-0990 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.1958 · DOI
- Kagermann H., 2013, Recommendations for implementing Industry 4.0 data
- 10.4324/9781315671420 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.2447 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125565 · DOI
- 10.1142/s1363919617400151 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.044 · DOI · Paper page
- Küpper D., 2016, The factory of the future
- 10.3390/su10113882 · DOI
- 10.3390/su8010043 · DOI
- 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00444.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.01.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.262 · DOI
- 10.1080/00207543.2019.1652777 · DOI
- 10.1108/09574090410700275 · DOI
- Miles M. B., 1994, Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook
- Ministry of Enterprise and Innovation, 2016, Smart industry—A strategy for new industrialisation for Sweden (N2016.06)
- 10.3390/su13094865 · DOI
- 10.3390/su10010247 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.019 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.2776 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104986 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.procir.2017.02.047 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00125.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.023 · DOI
- 10.1108/01443579310039533 · DOI
- 10.1108/ijopm-09-2017-0530 · DOI
- Porter M. E., 1995, Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate
- 10.1080/00207543.2019.1650976 · DOI
- Price Waterhouse Cooper, 2016, Industry 4.0—Building your digital enterprise
- Price Waterhouse Cooper, 2018, Skills for smart industrial specialisation and digital transformation
- 10.1002/csr.1761 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.169 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.005 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICE/ITMC52061.2021.9570204 · DOI
- SCALER, 2017, “SCALER”—Helping industries increase efficiency through resource sharing
- 10.1108/sampj-04-2019-0150 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.320 · DOI
- Schuh G., 2020, Industrie 4.0 maturity index: Managing the digital transformation of industries (Update 2020)
- 10.1002/bse.2884 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125280 · DOI
- 10.3390/app10238502 · DOI
- Siegel A., 2014, Retail horizons—Envisioning the future of retail
- 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.033 · DOI
- 10.1108/ijccsm-09-2016-0144 · DOI
- Storer M., 2009, Paper presented at the enhancing the innovation environment: Proceedings of the 10th International CINet Conference
- 10.1016/j.jom.2014.09.003 · DOI
- 10.3390/su13031434 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.640 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/icc/3.3.537-a · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
- Teknikföretagen, 2017, Made in Sweden 2030—Strategic agenda for innovation in production
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.291 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.11.059 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jom.2018.09.004 · DOI
- Vladimirova D., 2018, “SCALER”—Lessons learnt & best practices for enhancing industrial symbiosis in the process industry (Deliverable 2.2)
- 10.1186/1748-5908-10-S1-A44 · DOI
- 10.1111/jpim.12394 · DOI
- World Manufacturing Forum, 2019, The 2019 World Manufacturing Forum Report—Skills for the future of manufacturing
- Yin R. K., 2014, Case study research design and methods
- 10.1016/j.mfglet.2015.11.005 · DOI
- 10.3390/su9050765 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies
Minoja, M., & Romano, G. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143584 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Chari, A., Niedenzu, D., Despeisse, M., Machado, C. G., Azevedo, J. D., Boavida‐Dias, R., & Johansson, B.
- Affiliations
- Department of Industrial and Materials Science Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg Sweden
- Institute for Manufacturing University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
- Jönköping International Business School, Business Administration Jönköping University Jönköping Sweden
- FEUGA, Department of Innovation & Technology Transfer Campus Universitário Plaza Miralles Vigo Spain
- Instituto de Soldadura e Qualidade (ISQ), Low Carbon and Resource Efficiency, R&Di Grijó Portugal
- ORCID
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-03-22
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2500-2517
- ISSN
- 0964-4733
- 1099-0836
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review