Cited by 372Organizational Change and LeadershipSupply Chain Resilience and Risk ManagementOrganizational Management and Change

Change process: a key enabler for building resilient SMEs

Ates, Aylin, Bititci, Umit·2011·International Journal of Production Research

Abstract

Resilience is seen as a key organisational capability for sustainability in the current turbulent environment. At the same time, for organisations to be more sustainable and resilient, the delivery of innovative responses to the market through continuous change and improvement is necessary. If small and medium enterprises (SMEs) account for over 70% of the world's production, and there is a growing mandate to create sustainable SMEs, then instilling, developing and implementing change capabilities is paramount in making progress towards sustainability and resilience. Therefore, this article aims to demonstrate that change management process capability is fundamental to creating resilience in SMEs. This study is based on a multiple case study methodology through semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with 232 senior managers in 37 manufacturing SMEs across Europe. This article demonstrates that sustainability and resilience in SMEs will be enhanced by (1) ability to embrace organisational and people dimensions as well as operational aspects of change management, and (2) paying attention to long-term planning and external communication to drive change proactively. This article builds a bridge between the theoretical starting point, the results of empirical research and the usability of the presented findings in practice in order to contribute to the development of more resilient SMEs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207543.2011.563825

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ates, A., & Bititci, U.
Affiliations
University of Strathclyde (GB)
Corresponding author
Ates, Aylin
Venue
International Journal of Production Research
Published
2011-09-15
Volume
49
Issue
18
Pages
5601-5618
ISSN
  • 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-588X
OpenAlex
W2153466124
Cited by
372
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 2
FWCI
18.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Production Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Change
Keywords
change management, organizational resilience, small and medium-sized enterprises, manufacturing SMEs, long-term planning, external communication, organizational capabilities, continuous improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review