Cited by 42Environmental Sustainability in BusinessSustainable Supply Chain ManagementOrganic Food and Agriculture

Do eco labels matter for green business strategy and sustainable consumption? A mixed method investigation on green products

Pathak, Kanishka, Prakash, Gyan, Jain, Monika, Agarwal, Reeti, Attri, Rekha·2024·Business Strategy and the Environment

Abstract

Since the advent of the Industrial Revolution, factories have been spewing out noxious substances at an unmitigated rate, leading to environmental degradation. The need for sustainable consumption has stoked the desire for green products. The study aims to contribute to the existing body of knowledge regarding the use of eco‐labels by firms in order to meet the consumers' green purchasing behaviour. The study employs a mixed‐method approach to investigate the underlying psychological aspects that affect consumers' green purchasing behaviour. The current study used the grounded theory method to identify themes and variables based on the data collected through interviews. These themes and variables were subsequently used to construct the conceptual framework for the qualitative analysis. The conceptual framework was then empirically tested using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS‐SEM) statistical analysis (quantitative analysis). The findings unfold potential areas where businesses, through eco‐labels, could transpire information and capitalise on this behavioural shift among consumers for green products. The study eventually offers eco‐labels as a viable green business strategy which clears the haze of ambiguity and make space to safeguard our environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bse.3687

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PLS-SEM effectively handles small sample sizes, does not require data normalization, and is well-suited for predicting complex models that aid in theory development.

    “This study used PLS-SEM for data analysis because it effectively handles small sample sizes, does not require data normalization, and is well-suited for predicting complex models that aid in theory development, making it more appropriate than covariance-based Structural Equation Modeling (Hair et al. 2012(Hair et al. , 2019;;Pathak et al. 2024).”

    From Does Greenwashing Wash Away Gen Z's Green Purchase Intention? (2025) · cites this paper as Pathak et al. 2024

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pathak, K., Prakash, G., Jain, M., Agarwal, R., & Attri, R.
Affiliations
  • Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology Jalandhar (IN)
  • Birla Institute of Management Technology (BIMTECH) Greater Noida India
  • Jaipuria Institute of Management (IN)
Corresponding author
Jain, Monika
Venue
Business Strategy and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-02-02
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
4271-4291
ISSN
  • 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0836
OpenAlex
W4391512302
Cited by
42
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 5
FWCI
19.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Business Strategy and the Environment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
Keywords
eco-labels, green business strategy, sustainable consumption, green purchasing behaviour, green products, consumer psychology, environmental information, green marketing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review