The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subcultures and sustainability practices: the impact on understanding corporate sustainability
Abstract
In this paper we present findings of how employees from a single organization understand corporate sustainability. Responses from 255 survey participants indicate (1) that differences exist in how employees understand corporate sustainability and (2) that these differences can be partially explained by the presence of organizational subcultures and by differences in employee awareness of the organization's sustainability practices. In particular, findings reveal that employees from a subculture with a stronger emphasis on hierarchical and bureaucratic values emphasize an economic understanding of corporate sustainability. Implications for research and practice are discussed. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance
Carroll, A. B. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257850 · Cited by 10,480
Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.323 · Cited by 4,029
KEEPING AN EYE ON THE MIRROR: IMAGE AND IDENTITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL ADAPTATION.
Dutton, J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256405 · Cited by 2,931
Common methods bias: does common methods variance really bias results?
Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1998) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442819814002 · Cited by 1,380
Banerjee, S. B. (2001) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00246 · Cited by 538
Cited by
Addressing the SDGs in sustainability reports: The relationship with institutional factors
Rosati, F., & Faria, L. G. D. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.107 · Cited by 674
The Effects of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes
Glavas, A., & Kelley, K. (2014) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq20143206 · Cited by 657
Witjes, S., & Lozano, R. (2016) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.015 · Cited by 655
Linnenluecke, M. K., Griffiths, A., & Winn, M. (2012) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.708 · Cited by 457
Self-citationLeadership for Sustainability: An Evolution of Leadership Ability
Metcalf, L., & Benn, S. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1278-6 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Linnenluecke, M. K., Russell, S. V., & Griffiths, A.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-12-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 432-452
- ISSN
- 0964-4733
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2013741709
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 23.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
