Towards a more circular economy: proposing a framework linking sustainable public procurement and sustainable business models
Open accessAbstract
Sustainability aims at addressing environmental and socio-economic issues in the long term. In general, the literature on sustainability has focused mainly on the environmental issues, whereas, more recently, a Circular Economy has been proposed as one of the latest concepts for addressing both the environmental and socio-economic issues. A Circular Economy aims at transforming waste into resources and on bridging production and consumption activities; however, there is still limited research focusing on these aspects. This paper addresses the link between procurement and supply practices, and proposes changing from a traditional public procurement process, based on product-selling business models, to a more service-oriented system. The paper proposes a framework to include technical and non-technical specifications of product/service combinations that improve resource usage efficiency through recovery. The framework also considers socio-cultural specifications and physical and social proximity between the stakeholders in the procurement process. The framework is based on collaboration, which is a vital link between the public procurement process and the development of more sustainable business models, where the experience gained in the collaboration process serves as the bases for suppliers and procurers in improving their contribution to CE, whilst at the same time securing economic benefits for both parties. Although, in this process, the specification setting may take longer, the relationships between procurer and supplier tend to be longer lasting and stronger. This research shows that collaboration between procurers and suppliers throughout the procurement process can lead to reductions in raw material utilisation and waste generation, whilst promoting the development of new, more sustainable, business models.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
New business models are one way to contribute to the systemic change needed for a circular economy transition.
“New business models are one way to contribute to the systemic change needed for a circular economy transition (Bocken et al., 2016;Witjes and Lozano, 2016).”
From Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture (2023) · cites this paper as Witjes and Lozano, 2016
Public procurement can also stimulate PSS-oriented business models.
“public procurement can also stimulate PSS-oriented business models [15].”
From Public procurement of reconditioned furniture and the potential transition to product service systems solutions (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972 · see citing works
Partnerships from <i>cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business</i>
Elkington, J. (1998) · Environmental Quality Management · doi:10.1002/tqem.3310080106 · Cited by 5,341 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…although, a number of authors have highlighted the importance of balancing the sustainability issues (i.e. economic, environmental, and social; Elkington (1998)), and the time dimension, as well as their interconnections (Lozano, 2008) through a holistic perspective (see Escobar, 1999; Hjorth…”
BackgroundBeyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.323 · Cited by 4,029 · see citing works
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020 · see citing works
The Circular Economy: A New Development Strategy in China
Yuan, Z., Bi, J., & Moriguichi, Y. (2006) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/108819806775545321 · Cited by 1,175 · cited 7× · see citing works
“CE1 is based on –closing loops’ through different types and levels of recovery (Yong, 2007; Yuan et al., 2006) by transforming material into useful goods and services through resource efficiency (Klettner et al., 2013; Webster, 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialSustainable procurement in the public sector: an international comparative study
Brammer, S., & Walker, H. (2011) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443571111119551 · Cited by 731 · see citing works
The relationship between sustainable procurement and e-procurement in the public sector
Walker, H., & Brammer, S. (2012) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.008 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Fostering sustainability through sourcing from small businesses: public sector perspectives
Walker, H., & Preuss, L. (2008) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.014 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 58
- Afuah, A., 2004. Business Models: A Strategic Management Approach, 1st ed. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.
- Atkinson, G., 2000. Measuring corporate sustainability. J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 43 (2), 235-252.
- Baumgartner, R.J., 2009. Organizational culture and leadership: preconditions for the development of a sustainable corporation. Sustain. Dev. 17, 102-113, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd. · DOI
- Beattie, V., Smith, S.J., 2013. Value creation and business models: refocusing the intellectual capital debate. Br. Account. Rev. 45, 243-254, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.bar.2013.06.001. · DOI
- Bilitewski, B., 2012. The circular economy and its risks. Waste Manag. 32, 1-2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.10.004. · DOI
- Bocken, N.M.P., Short, S.W., Rana, P., Evans, S., 2014. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. J. Clean. Prod. 65, 42-56, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039. · DOI · Paper page
- Bohnsack, R., Pinkse, J., Kolk, A., 2014. Business models for sustainable technologies: exploring business model evolution in the case of electric vehicles. Res. Policy 43, 284-300, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10. 014. · DOI · Paper page
- Boons, F., Lüdeke-Freund, F., 2013. Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. J. Clean. Prod. 45, 9-19, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007. · DOI · Paper page
- Borgatti, S., 2003. The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology. J. Manage. 29, 991-1013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149- 2063(03)00087-4. · DOI
- Bryman, A., 2004. Social Research Methods, Second edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Burkhart, T., Wolter, S., Schief, M., Krumeich, J., Di Valentin, C., Werth, D., Loos, P., Vanderhaeghen, D., 2012. A comprehensive approach towards the structural description of business models. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems-MEDES '12, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, p. 88, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2457276.2457294. · DOI
- Casadesus-Masanell, R., Ricart, J.E., 2010. From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Plann. 43, 195-215, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp. 2010.01.004. · DOI
- Costanza, R., 1991. Ecological Economics. The Science and Management of Sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York.
- Cuijpers, M., Guenter, H., Hussinger, K., 2011. Costs and benefits of inter-departmental innovation collaboration. Res. Policy 40, 565-575, http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.12.004. · DOI
- DaSilva, C.M., Trkman, P., 2014. Business model: what it is and what it is not. Long Range Plann. 47, 379-389, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.004. · DOI
- Day, C., 2005. Buying green: the crucial role of public authorities. Local Environ. 10, 201-209, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1354983042000388214. · DOI
- Demil, B., Lecocq, X., 2010. Business model evolution: in search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Plann. 43, 227-246, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp. 2010.02.004. · DOI
- Dietrich, P., Eskerod, P., Dalcher, D., Sandhawalia, B., 2010. The dynamics of collaboration in multipartner projects. Proj. Manag. J. 41, 59-78, http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/pmj.20194. · DOI
- Glavič, P., Lukman, R., 2007. Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. J. Clean. Prod. 15, 1875-1885, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.12.006. · DOI
- Guide, V.D.R., Van Wassenhove, L.N., 2001. Managing product returns for remanufacturing. Prod. Oper. Manag. 10, 142-155, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j. 1937-5956.2001.tb00075.x. · DOI
- Hienerth, C., Keinz, P., Lettl, C., 2011. Exploring the nature and implementation process of user-centric business models. Long Range Plann. 44, 344-374, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2011.09.009. · DOI
- Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., O'Brien, G., 2005. Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustain. Dev. 13, 38-52, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd. 244. · DOI
- Jupp, V. (Ed.), 2006. The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods. SAGE Publications, London.
- Kamann, D.-J.F., 2007. Organizational design in public procurement: a stakeholder approach. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 13, 127-136, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. pursup.2007.05.002. · DOI
- Klettner, A., Clarke, T., Boersma, M., 2013. The governance of corporate sustainability: empirical insights into the development, leadership and implementation of responsible business strategy. J. Bus. Ethics 1-21, http://dx. doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1750-y. · DOI
- Lay, G., Schroeter, M., Biege, S., 2009. Service-based business concepts: a typology for business-to-business markets. Eur. Manag. J. 27, 442-455, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.emj.2009.04.002. · DOI
- Lüdeke-Freund, F., 2010. Towards a conceptual framework of business models for sustainability. In: ERSCP-EMSU Conference, Delft, The Netherlands, October 25-29, 2010, pp. 1-28.
- Leontief, Wassilij, 1928. Die wirtschaft als kreislauf. In: PhD Dissertation.
- Linnenluecke, M.K., Russell, S.V., Griffiths, A., 2009. Subcultures and sustainability practices: the impact on understanding corporate sustainability. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 18, 432-452, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.609. · DOI
- Lockett, H., Johnson, M., Evans, S., Bastl, M., 2011. Product Service Systems and supply network relationships: an exploratory case study. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 22, 293-313, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410381111112684. · DOI
- Lozano, R., 2008. Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally. J. Clean. Prod. 39 (16), 1838-1846, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.02.008. · DOI
- Lozano, R., 2012. Towards better embedding sustainability into companies' systems: an analysis of voluntary corporate initiatives. J. Clean. Prod. 25, 14-26, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.060. · DOI
- Lozano, R., 2013a. Are Companies Planning their Organisational Changes for Corporate Sustainability? An analysis of three case studies on resistance to change and their strategies to overcome it. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 20, 275-295, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/csr.1290. · DOI
- Luukkonen, T., Nedeva, M., 2010. Towards understanding integration in research and research policy. Res. Policy 39, 674-686, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. respol.2010.02.008. · DOI
- Meehan, J., Bryde, D., 2011. Sustainable procurement practice. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 20, 94-106, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.678. · DOI · Paper page
- Melissen, F., Reinders, H., 2012. A reflection on the Dutch sustainable public procurement programme. J. Integr. Environ. Sci. 9, 27-36, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1080/1943815X.2012.658815. · DOI
- Mont, O.K., 2002. Clarifying the concept of product-service system. J. Clean. Prod. 10, 237-245, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00039-7. · DOI · Paper page
- Mont, O., Dalhammar, C., Jacobsson, N., 2006. A new business model for baby prams based on leasing and product remanufacturing. J. Clean. Prod. 14, 1509-1518, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.024. · DOI
- Murray, A., Skene, K., Haynes, K., 2015. The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. J. Bus. Ethics, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2. · DOI · Paper page
- Naustdalslid, J., 2014. Circular economy in China-the environmental dimension of the harmonious society. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 4509, 1-11, http://dx. doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2014.914599. · DOI
- Parikka-Alhola, K., 2008. Promoting environmentally sound furniture by green public procurement. Ecol. Econ. 68, 472-485, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2008.05.004. · DOI · Paper page
- Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R., 2011. Creating shared value. Harv. Bus. Rev., 63-77, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09600039410055963. · DOI
- Preuss, L., 2009. Addressing sustainable development through public procurement: the case of local government. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 14, 213-223, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598540910954557. · DOI · Paper page
- Rauter, R., Jonker, J., Baumgartner, R.J., 2015. Going one's own way: drivers in developing business models for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod., http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.104. · DOI
- Rietbergen, M.G., Blok, K., 2013. Assessing the potential impact of the CO2 Performance Ladder on the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions in the Netherlands. J. Clean. Prod. 52, 33-45, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013. 03.027. · DOI
- Rees, W.E., 2002. An ecological economics perspective on sustainability and prospects for ending poverty. Popul. Environ. 24 (1), 15-46.
- Robèrt, K.-H., 2000. Tools and concepts for sustainable development, how do they relate to a general framework for sustainable development, and to each other? J. Clean. Prod. 8, 243-254, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00011-1. · DOI
- Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., 2007. <EDN></EDN>. In: Research Methods for Business Students, 4th ed. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, UK.
- Srivastava, S.K., 2007. Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. Int. J. Manag. Rev., http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370. 2007.00202.x. · DOI · Paper page
- Stubbs, W., Cocklin, C., 2008. Conceptualizing a Sustainability Business. Organ. Environ., http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1086026608318042. · DOI
- Teece, D.J., 2010. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plann. 43, 172-194, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003. · DOI · Paper page
- Thomson, J., Jackson, T., 2007. Sustainable procurement in practice: lessons from local government. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 50, 421-444, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1080/09640560701261695. · DOI
- Uyarra, E., Edler, J., Garcia-Estevez, J., Georghiou, L., Yeow, J., 2014. Barriers to innovation through public procurement: a supplier perspective. Technovation 34, 631-645, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.04.003. · DOI · Paper page
- Vermeulen, W.J.V., Witjes, S., 2016. On addressing the dual and embedded nature of business and the route towards corporate sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 112, 2822-2832, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.132. · DOI
- WCED, 1987. Our Common Future, 1st ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Webster, K., 2013. What might we say about a circular economy? Some temptations to avoid if possible. World Futures: J. New Paradig. Res. 69, 542-554, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2013.835977. · DOI
- Yong, R., 2007. The circular economy in China. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 9, 121-129, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10163-007-0183-z. · DOI
- Zott, C., Amit, R., 2010. Business model design: an activity system perspective. Long Range Plann. 43, 216-226, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU)
Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., & Hekkert, M. (2018) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028 · Cited by 1,903 · see citing works
Circular supply chain management: a definition and structured literature review
Farooque, M., Zhang, A., Thürer, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.303 · Cited by 894 · see citing works
Review of green and sustainable public procurement: Towards circular public procurement
Sönnichsen, S. D., & Clement, J. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118901 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
“Further, highlighting the importance of socio-cultural specifications and physical and social proximity among stakeholders in the procurement processes (Witjes and Lozano, 2016).”
BackgroundExploiting the potential of public procurement: opportunities for circular economy
Alhola, K., Ryding, S. O., Salmenperä, H., & Busch, N. J. (2019) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12770 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
The circular economy and the bio-based sector - perspectives of European and German stakeholders
Leipold, S., & Petit-Boix, A. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.019 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Husgafvel, R., Linkosalmi, L., Hughes, M., Kanerva, J., & Dahl, O. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.176 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
A systematic review on barriers and enablers toward circular procurement management
Qazi, A. A., & Appolloni, A. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.07.013 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Addressing Sustainability within Public Procurement of Food: A Systematic Literature Review
Molin, E., Martin, M., & Björklund, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132313395 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Öhgren, M., Milios, L., Dalhammar, C., & Lindahl, M. (2019) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.134 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Ortega Carrasco, P., Iannone, F., Ferrón Vílchez, V., & Testa, F. (2025) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3234 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture
Lingegård, S., & von Oelreich, K. (2023) · Frontiers in Sustainability · doi:10.3389/frsus.2023.1136725 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“New business models are one way to contribute to the systemic change needed for a circular economy transition (Bocken et al., 2016; Witjes and Lozano, 2016).”
Background
- Authors
- Witjes, S., & Lozano, R.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Witjes, Sjors
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 112
- Pages
- 37-44
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2346839073
- Cited by
- 655
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 139.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Union Rebus
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
- Keywords
- circular economy, sustainable public procurement, sustainable business models, procurement specifications, resource recovery, waste reduction, product-service combinations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
