Cited by 92Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesSocial and Intergroup PsychologyGender and Feminist Studies

Effects of gender and sexuality on judgements of victim blame and rape myth acceptance in a depicted male rape

Davies, Michelle, McCartney, Samantha·2003·Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

Relatively few studies have investigated judgements towards male rape, and no published studies have investigated gay men's judgements towards this offence. The current study investigated the effects of gender and sexuality on victim blame and male rape myth acceptance in the depicted rape of a gay man. It was predicted that heterosexual men would make the most anti‐victim judgements, while gay men would make the most pro‐victim judgements. One hundred and fifty members of the UK population read a scenario that depicted a male rape, and then completed a questionnaire that measured blame and rape myths. As predicted, heterosexual men endorsed more rape myths and blamed the victim more than heterosexual women or gay men. Gay men made the most pro‐victim judgements overall. Results are discussed in relation to homophobia and traditional gender roles. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/casp.741

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davies, M., & McCartney, S.
Affiliations
University of Lancashire (GB)
Corresponding author
Davies, Michelle
Venue
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-08-07
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
391-398
ISSN
  • 1052-9284 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1298
OpenAlex
W2066705237
Cited by
92
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
male rape, victim blaming, rape myths, gender differences, sexual orientation, gay men, heterosexual men, heterosexual women, homophobia, gender roles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review