Effects of gender and sexuality on judgements of victim blame and rape myth acceptance in a depicted male rape
Abstract
Relatively few studies have investigated judgements towards male rape, and no published studies have investigated gay men's judgements towards this offence. The current study investigated the effects of gender and sexuality on victim blame and male rape myth acceptance in the depicted rape of a gay man. It was predicted that heterosexual men would make the most anti‐victim judgements, while gay men would make the most pro‐victim judgements. One hundred and fifty members of the UK population read a scenario that depicted a male rape, and then completed a questionnaire that measured blame and rape myths. As predicted, heterosexual men endorsed more rape myths and blamed the victim more than heterosexual women or gay men. Gay men made the most pro‐victim judgements overall. Results are discussed in relation to homophobia and traditional gender roles. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research into non-policing samples has found that sexual orientation factors are influential.
“This is particularly crucial, considering that research into non-policing samples has found that such factors are influential.”
From From 'real rape' to real justice: A systematic review of police officers' rape myth beliefs (2017) · cites this paper as Davies & McCartney, 2003
Gay men make more pro-victim judgements overall than heterosexual men.
“Specifically, heterosexual men appear to endorse more rape myths than women or gay men, and gay men make more pro-victim judgements overall (Davies & McCartney, 2003).”
From From 'real rape' to real justice: A systematic review of police officers' rape myth beliefs (2017) · cites this paper as Davies & McCartney, 2003
Heterosexual men appear to endorse more rape myths than women or gay men.
“Specifically, heterosexual men appear to endorse more rape myths than women or gay men, and gay men make more pro-victim judgements overall (Davies & McCartney, 2003).”
From From 'real rape' to real justice: A systematic review of police officers' rape myth beliefs (2017) · cites this paper as Davies & McCartney, 2003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
From 'real rape' to real justice: A systematic review of police officers' rape myth beliefs
Parratt, K. A., & Pina, A. (2017) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2017.03.005 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Gender-Blind Sexism and Rape Myth Acceptance’,
Stoll, L. C., Lilley, T. G., & Pinter, K. (2017) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801216636239 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Sleath, E., & Bull, R. (2015) · Violence and Victims · doi:10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-13-00035 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
- Authors
- Davies, M., & McCartney, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Lancashire (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Davies, Michelle
- Venue
- Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-08-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 391-398
- ISSN
- 1052-9284 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1298
- OpenAlex
- W2066705237
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- male rape, victim blaming, rape myths, gender differences, sexual orientation, gay men, heterosexual men, heterosexual women, homophobia, gender roles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review