Cited by 55Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesPolicing Practices and PerceptionsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

A brief report on rape myth acceptance: Differences between police officers, law students, and psychology students in the United Kingdom

Open access
Sleath, Emma, Bull, Ray·2015·Violence and Victims

Abstract

A common perception is that police officers hold very negative attitudes about rape victims. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to establish whether police officers do accept stereotypical rape myths at a higher level compared to members of other populations. There were 3 comparison samples, composed of police officers, law students, and psychology students, that completed the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance scale. Male and female police officers accepted “she lied” myths at a higher level than the student samples. Student samples were found to accept 2 types of rape myths (“she asked for it” and “he didn’t meant to”) at a higher level compared to police officers. No significant differences were found in the other 4 subfactors. Therefore, the pattern of results suggests that police officers do not adhere to stereotypical myths about rape victims more than do other populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-13-00035

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sleath, E., & Bull, R.
Affiliations
  • Coventry University (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Venue
Violence and Victims
Published
2015
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
136-147
ISSN
  • 0886-6708 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7073
OpenAlex
W2093150234
Cited by
55
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
10.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Violence and Victims (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Coventry University Open Collections (Coventry university) (submittedVersion)
  • The Open Collections (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
rape myth acceptance, rape myths, police officers, attitudes toward rape victims, law students, psychology students, gender differences, victim blaming
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mythology, Rape, Social Perception, Social Values, Students, Police, Crime Victims, Complicity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review