The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cell‐Free Protein Synthesis: Pros and Cons of Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Systems
Open accessAbstract
From its start as a small‐scale in vitro system to study fundamental translation processes, cell‐free protein synthesis quickly rose to become a potent platform for the high‐yield production of proteins. In contrast to classical in vivo protein expression, cell‐free systems do not need time‐consuming cloning steps, and the open nature provides easy manipulation of reaction conditions as well as high‐throughput potential. Especially for the synthesis of difficult to express proteins, such as toxic and transmembrane proteins, cell‐free systems are of enormous interest. The modification of the genetic code to incorporate non‐canonical amino acids into the target protein in particular provides enormous potential in biotechnology and pharmaceutical research and is in the focus of many cell‐free projects. Many sophisticated cell‐free systems for manifold applications have been established. This review describes the recent advances in cell‐free protein synthesis and details the expanding applications in this field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kim, J. Y., Kim, Y.-G., & Lee, G. M. (2012) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3758-5 · Cited by 801
A chemical toolkit for proteins — an expanded genetic code
Xie, J., & Schultz, P. G. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2005 · Cited by 408
The Dark Side of EGFP: Defective Polyubiquitination
Baens, M., Noels, H., Broeckx, V., Hagens, S., Fevery, S., Billiau, A. D., Vankelecom, H., & Marynen, P. (2006) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000054 · Cited by 149
Picanco-Castro, V., Biaggio, R., Cova, D., & Swiech, K. (2013) · Protein & Peptide Letters · doi:10.2174/092986652012131112130322 · Cited by 34
Cited by
Progress in biopharmaceutical development
Kesik‐Brodacka, M. (2018) · Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/bab.1617 · Cited by 353
Reconstituting Natural Cell Elements in Synthetic Cells
Gaut, N. J., & Adamala, K. P. (2021) · Advanced Biology · doi:10.1002/adbi.202000188 · Cited by 92
Ayoubi‐Joshaghani, M. H., Dianat‐Moghadam, H., Seidi, K., Jahanban‐Esfahalan, A., Zare, P., & Jahanban‐Esfahlan, R. (2020) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.27248 · Cited by 52
Rapid Generation of Monoclonal Antibodies from Single B Cells by Ecobody Technology
Ojima-Kato, T., Morishita, S., Uchida, Y., Nagai, S., Kojima, T., & Nakano, H. (2018) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib7040038 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Zemella, A., Thoring, L., Hoffmeister, C., & Kubick, S.
- Venue
- ChemBioChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-10-19
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2420-2431
- ISSN
- 1439-4227 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-7633
- OpenAlex
- W2098623212
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell‐Free Protein Synthesis: Pros and Cons of Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cbic.201500340
- The paper
- Zemella, A., Thoring, L., Hoffmeister, C., & Kubick, S. (2015). Cell‐Free Protein Synthesis: Pros and Cons of Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Systems. ChemBioChem. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201500340
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.