The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 106 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review on Quantitative Multiplexed Proteomics
Open accessAbstract
Over the last few decades, mass spectrometry‐based proteomics has become an increasingly powerful tool that is now able to routinely detect and quantify thousands of proteins. A major advance for global protein quantification was the introduction of isobaric tags, which, in a single experiment, enabled the global quantification of proteins across multiple samples. Herein, these methods are referred to as multiplexed proteomics. The principles, advantages, and drawbacks of various multiplexed proteomics techniques are discussed and compared with alternative approaches. We also discuss how the emerging combination of multiplexing with targeted proteomics might enable the reliable and high‐quality quantification of very low abundance proteins across multiple conditions. Lastly, we suggest that fusing multiplexed proteomics with data‐independent acquisition approaches might enable the comparison of hundreds of different samples without missing values, while maintaining the superb measurement precision and accuracy obtainable with isobaric tag quantification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Major developments in mass spectrometry-based, antibody-based and aptamer-based proteomics over the past decade have enabled the robust quantification of thousands of proteins in single samples87–90.”
From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [87]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D., Creasy, D. M., & Cottrell, J. S. (1999) · Electrophoresis · doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-2683(19991201)20:18 · Cited by 8,264
Electrospray Ionization for Mass Spectrometry of Large Biomolecules
Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F., & Whitehouse, C. M. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2675315 · Cited by 7,634
Eng, J. K., McCormack, A. L., & Yates, J. R. (1994) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1016/1044-0305(94)80016-2 · Cited by 6,484
Ong, S.-E., Blagoev, B., Kratchmarova, I., Kristensen, D. B., Steen, H., Pandey, A., & Mann, M. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m200025-mcp200 · Cited by 5,574
Andromeda: A Peptide Search Engine Integrated into the MaxQuant Environment
Cox, J., Neuhauser, N., Michalski, A., Scheltema, R. A., Olsen, J. V., & Mann, M. (2011) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr101065j · Cited by 5,520
Cox, J., Hein, M. Y., Luber, C. A., Paron, I., Nagaraj, N., & Mann, M. (2014) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m113.031591 · Cited by 5,180
A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry.
Nesvizhskii, A., Keller, A., Kolker, E., & Aebersold, R. (2003) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac0341261 · Cited by 4,902
Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags
Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Gerber, S. A., Turecek, F., Gelb, M. H., & Aebersold, R. (1999) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/13690 · Cited by 4,683
Ross, P. L., Huang, Y. N., Marchese, J. N., Williamson, B., Parker, K., Hattan, S., Khainovski, N., Pillai, S., Dey, S., Daniels, S., et al. (2004) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m400129-mcp200 · Cited by 4,401
Gillet, L. C., Navarro, P., Tate, S., Röst, H., Selevsek, N., Reiter, L., Bonner, R., & Aebersold, R. (2012) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.o111.016717 · Cited by 2,877
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Gundry R. L., 2009, Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol., 10, 1025
- Tolonen A. C., 2014, J. Vis. Exp., 89, 51416
- Yan W., 2011, Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 10, 110
- L. Peshkin L. Ryazanova M. Wühr bioRxiv2019 DOI:https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/210476. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Measuring biological age using omics data
Rutledge, J., Oh, H., & Wyss-Coray, T. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-022-00511-7 · Cited by 570
Li, J., Vranken, J. G. V., Vaites, L. P., Schweppe, D. K., Huttlin, E. L., Etienne, C. L., Nandhikonda, P., Viner, R., Robitaille, A. M., Thompson, A. H., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0781-4 · Cited by 440
Quantitative Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics: An Overview
Rozanova, S., Barkovits, K., Nikolov, M., Schmidt, C., Urlaub, H., & Marcus, K. (2021) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1024-4_8 · Cited by 306
Bioinformatics Methods for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Data Analysis
Chen, C., Hou, J., Tanner, J. J., & Cheng, J. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21082873 · Cited by 280
Unbiased spatial proteomics with single-cell resolution in tissues
Mund, A., Brunner, A.-D., & Mann, M. (2022) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2022.05.022 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Pappireddi, N., Martin, L., & Wühr, M.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wühr, Martin
- ORCID
- Wühr, Martin
- Venue
- ChemBioChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-04-18
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1210-1224
- ISSN
- 1439-4227 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-7633
- PMC
- PMC6520187
- OpenAlex
- W2908241150
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 3.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- ChemBioChem (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1R35GM128813, T32GM007388)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0018420, DE-SC0018260)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- multiplexed proteomics, quantitative proteomics, isobaric tags, targeted proteomics, low-abundance proteins, data-independent acquisition, mass spectrometry
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Isotope Labeling, Proteins, Proteome, Proteomics, Tandem Mass Spectrometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
