The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Engineered E. coli Strain for Direct in Vivo Fluorination
Abstract
Selectively fluorinated compounds are found frequently in pharmaceutical and agrochemical products where currently 25–30 % of optimised compounds emerge from development containing at least one fluorine atom. There are many methods for the site‐specific introduction of fluorine, but all are chemical and they often use environmentally challenging reagents. Biochemical processes for C−F bond formation are attractive, but they are extremely rare. In this work, the fluorinase enzyme, originally identified from the actinomycete bacterium Streptomyces cattleya , is engineered into Escherichia coli in such a manner that the organism is able to produce 5′‐fluorodeoxyadenosine (5′‐FDA) from S ‐adenosyl‐ l ‐methionine (SAM) and fluoride in live E. coli cells. Success required the introduction of a SAM transporter and deletion of the endogenous fluoride efflux capacity in order to generate an E. coli host that has the potential for future engineering of more elaborate fluorometabolites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Earlier studies strongly indicate that fluoride anion toxicity is a major impediment to progress in both organofluorine synthesis and degradation.
“Earlier studies on biological organofluorine synthesis and degradation strongly indicate that fluoride anion toxicity is a major impediment to progress in both fields of study21,55,63,64.”
From The link between ancient microbial fluoride resistance mechanisms and bioengineering organofluorine degradation or synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [64]
Biosynthesis of fluoroacetate in E. coli requires not only the biosynthetic genes from S. cattleya, but also chromosomal knockouts of the crcB gene, which encodes a fluoride channel.
“For example, biosynthesis of fluoroacetate in E. coli requires not only the biosynthetic genes from S. cattleya, but also chromosomal knockouts of the crcB gene, which encodes a fluoride channel64.”
From The link between ancient microbial fluoride resistance mechanisms and bioengineering organofluorine degradation or synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [64]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial fluoride resistance, Fluc channels, and the weak acid accumulation effect
Ji, C., Stockbridge, R. B., & Miller, C. (2014) · Journal of General Physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.201411243 · Cited by 97
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- J. Emsley Nature′s building blocks: An AZ guide to the elements Oxford University Press 2001.
- 10.1021/cr500209t · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01788 · DOI
- 10.1002/chem.201901840 · DOI
- Marais J. S. C., 1944, J. Vet. Sci. Anim. Ind., 20, 67
- 10.1038/190808a0 · DOI
- 10.1016/0031-9422(93)85020-R · DOI
- 10.7164/antibiotics.39.259 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-394291-3.00003-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.10.012 · DOI
- 10.1038/416279a · DOI
- 10.1038/nature02280 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/cbic.201300732 · DOI
- 10.1039/C4OB00970C · DOI
- 10.1039/C6RA00100A · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1215063 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/bi051558s · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.082 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01272 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1310439110 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1210896109 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/cb3002057 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1099/13500872-141-6-1385 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/jb.170.8.3493-3498.1988 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M304622200 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.02.014 · DOI
- 10.1002/anie.201606722 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ange.201606722 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/cdg574 · DOI
- 10.1042/bj20031664 · DOI
- 10.1105/tpc.105.040741 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.185.10.3031-3035.2003 · DOI
- 10.1128/mBio.00051-11 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/27.22.4409 · DOI
- 10.2174/1874285801812010107 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.1555 · DOI
- 10.1021/np900719u · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stockbridge, R. B., & Wackett, L. P. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-49018-1 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Markakis, K., Lowe, P. T., Davison‐Gates, L., O'Hagan, D., Rosser, S. J., & Elfick, A.
- Venue
- ChemBioChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-03-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1856-1860
- ISSN
- 1439-4227
- 1439-7633
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review