The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS)
Abstract
Eight hundred seventy arteriograms from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) were independently read by readers at two different clinics to evaluate the reproducibility of the interpretation of coronary arteriograms. Among proximal segments, the interpretation of lesions of the left main coronary artery were the least reproducible, P < .02. When one angiographer reads a stenosis of 50% or more in the left main coronary artery, it is estimated that a second reader will report no lesion 18.6% of the time. In 94.7% of the films, the number of significantly (≥70% stenosis) diseased vessels was the same for both readers (72.1%) or differed by one vessel (22.6%). The reproducibility of interpretation of films of good or acceptable quality or completeness was better than the reproducibility of readings of arteriograms judged to be of poor quality or incomplete studies. The mean absolute difference between readings of the percent stenosis decreased over the time of the patient enroliment, 1975 to 1978. This may have resulted from major collaborative efforts made during the course of the study to improve the quality of angiography and to standardize the reading of the cine films.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Statistical Methods in Medical Research.
Armitage, P. (1972) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2556182 · Cited by 4,029
Interobserver variability in coronary angiography.
Zir, L. M., Miller, S. W., Dinsmore, R. E., Gilbert, J. P., & Harthorne, J. W. (1976) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.53.4.627 · Cited by 768
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions.
Fielding, A., & Fleiss, J. L. (1974) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344565 · Cited by 767
Takaro, T., Hultgren, H. N., Lipton, M. J., & Detre, K. M. (1976) · PubMed · Cited by 491
Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms.
DeRouen, T. A., Murray, J. A., & Owen, W. (1977) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.55.2.324 · Cited by 485
Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms.
Detre, K. M., Wright, E., Murphy, M. L., & Takaro, T. (1975) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.52.6.979 · Cited by 447
The lungs as receptor sites for cardiovascular regulation.
Shepherd, J. T. (1981) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.63.1.1 · Cited by 339
Reproducibility of a consensus panel in the interpretation of coronary angiograms
Sanmarco, M. E., Brooks, S. H., & Blankenhorn, D. H. (1978) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/0002-8703(78)90151-5 · Cited by 137
Cited by
Scanlon, P. J., Faxon, D. P., Audet, A.-M., Carabello, B., Dehmer, G. J., Eagle, K. A., Legako, R. D., Leon, D. F., Murray, J. A., Nissen, S. E., et al. (1999) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00126-6 · Cited by 1,123
Self-citationAlderman, E. L., Corley, S. D., Fisher, L. D., Chaitman, B. R., Faxon, D. P., Foster, E. D., Killip, T., Sosa, J. A., & Bourassa, M. G. (1993) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(93)90429-5 · Cited by 350
Self-citationde la Torre Hernandez, J. M., Hernández Hernandez, F., Alfonso, F., Rumoroso, J. R., Lopez-Palop, R., Sadaba, M., Carrillo, P., Rondan, J., Lozano, I., Ruiz Nodar, J. M., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.064 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Fisher, L. D., Judkins, M. P., Lesperance, J., Cameron, A., Swaye, P., Ryan, T., Maynard, C., Bourassa, M., Kennedy, J. W., Gosselin, A., Kemp, H., Faxon, D., Wexler, L., & Davis, K. B.
- Venue
- Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 565-575
- ISSN
- 0098-6569 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0304
- OpenAlex
- W2000378439
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ccd.1810080605
- The paper
- Fisher, L. D., Judkins, M. P., Lesperance, J., Cameron, A., Swaye, P., Ryan, T., Maynard, C., Bourassa, M., Kennedy, J. W., Gosselin, A., Kemp, H., Faxon, D., Wexler, L., & Davis, K. B. (1982). Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810080605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
