The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms.
Open accessAbstract
Variability in coronary arteriogram readings was studied by having cine films from ten patients read by eleven readers. Three of the eleven subsequently met as an expert panel to provide a joint evaluation which could serve as a standard. Considerable variability was found between individual readers and between readers and the panel. The average standard deviation for estimation of any segmental stenosis by any single reader was 18%. Disagreement about the number of major vessels with a 70% stenosis occurred 31% of the time. Discrepancies were most likely to occur in analyzing distal arterial segments, in reading nonopacified segments, and during analysis of films showing more severe disease or having poorer technical quality. Recent experience in reading arteriograms seemed to be the most important characteristic in determining the accuracy of a reader. A protocol for the use of three readers is suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interobserver variability in coronary angiography.
Zir, L. M., Miller, S. W., Dinsmore, R. E., Gilbert, J. P., & Harthorne, J. W. (1976) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.53.4.627 · Cited by 768
Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms.
Detre, K. M., Wright, E., Murphy, M. L., & Takaro, T. (1975) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.52.6.979 · Cited by 447
YERUSHALMY, J. (1969) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0033-8389(22)01511-1 · Cited by 173
OBSERVERS' ERRORS IN TAKING MEDICAL HISTORIES
Cochrane, A. L., Chapman, P. J., & Oldham, P. D. (1951) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(51)92518-4 · Cited by 151
OBSERVER DISAGREEMENT IN PHYSICAL SIGNS OF THE RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Smyllie, H. C., Blendis, L. M., & Armitage, P. (1965) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(65)90759-2 · Cited by 100
Cited by
Scanlon, P. J., Faxon, D. P., Audet, A.-M., Carabello, B., Dehmer, G. J., Eagle, K. A., Legako, R. D., Leon, D. F., Murray, J. A., Nissen, S. E., et al. (1999) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00126-6 · Cited by 1,123
Self-citationReiber, J. H., Serruys, P. W., Kooijman, C. J., Wijns, W., Slager, C. J., Gerbrands, J. J., Schuurbiers, J. C., den Boer, A., & Hugenholtz, P. G. (1985) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.71.2.280 · Cited by 829
ARNETT, E. N., ISNER, J. M., REDWOOD, D. R., KENT, K. M., BAKER, W. P., ACKERSTEIN, H., & ROBERTS, W. C. (1979) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-91-3-350 · Cited by 628
Alderman, E. L., Corley, S. D., Fisher, L. D., Chaitman, B. R., Faxon, D. P., Foster, E. D., Killip, T., Sosa, J. A., & Bourassa, M. G. (1993) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(93)90429-5 · Cited by 350
Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS)
Fisher, L. D., Judkins, M. P., Lesperance, J., Cameron, A., Swaye, P., Ryan, T., Maynard, C., Bourassa, M., Kennedy, J. W., Gosselin, A., et al. (1982) · Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/ccd.1810080605 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- DeRouen, T. A., Murray, J. A., & Owen, W.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1977-02
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 324-328
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2039532481
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.55.2.324
- The paper
- DeRouen, T. A., Murray, J. A., & Owen, W. (1977). Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.55.2.324
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
