CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 37Counseling Practices and SupervisionSocial Work Education and PracticeRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Supervisor Cultural Humility Predicts Intentional Nondisclosure by Post‐Master's Counselors

Cook, Ryan M., Jones, Connie T., Welfare, Laura E.·2020·Counselor Education and Supervision
DOI 10.1002/ceas.12173
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The authors examined supervisor cultural humility as a predictor of supervisee intentional nondisclosure. Using multiple regression in a sample of 101 post‐master's counselors, the authors found that 20% of supervisees' intentional nondisclosure was explained by their perceptions of their supervisors' level of cultural humility.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ceas.12173

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cook et al. (2020) found that supervisors' CH effectively mitigated supervisees' intentional nondisclosure.

    “For example, Cook et al. (2020) found that supervisors' CH effectively mitigated supervisees' intentional nondisclosure (a common problem involved in the process of clinical supervision which often results from supervisors' lack of relational sensitivity).”

    From Cultural humility and cultural competence in counseling: An exploratory mixed methods investigation (2023) · cites this paper as Cook et al., 2020

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1002/jcad.12132 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cohen J., 2003, Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences
  4. 10.1037/0022-0167.54.2.142 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/ceas.12111 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/07325223.2019.1608344 · DOI
  7. Ellis M. V. &Colvin K. F.(2016 June).Supervisee non‐disclosure in clinical supervision: Developing the construct and testing the psychometric properties of the SNDS. Paper presented at the Twelfth International Interdisciplinary Conference on Clinical Supervision Garden City NY.
  8. 10.1002/j.1556-6978.1994.tb00321.x · DOI
  9. 10.1080/10503300701697505 · DOI
  10. 10.1037/a0032595 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2016.70.2.149 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/07325223.2018.1560384 · DOI
  13. 10.1037/0022-0167.43.1.10 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/07325223.2018.1509756 · DOI
  15. 10.1300/J497v75n01_03 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/j.2161-1912.1992.tb00563.x · DOI
  17. 10.1080/14733140601140881 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/07325223.2018.1487355 · DOI
  19. 10.1037/0033-3204.33.4.567 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cook, R. M., Jones, C. T., & Welfare, L. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Cook, Ryan M.
ORCID
Venue
Counselor Education and Supervision
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-06
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
160-167
ISSN
  • 0011-0035 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6978
DOI
10.1002/ceas.12173
OpenAlex
W3035373553
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 7 d)
Locations
Counselor Education and Supervision (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
cultural humility, counselor supervision, supervisor perceptions, counselor self-disclosure, multicultural counseling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review