CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,317Counseling Practices and SupervisionPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cultural humility: Measuring openness to culturally diverse clients.

Hook, Joshua N., Davis, Don E., Owen, Jesse, Worthington, Everett L., Utsey, Shawn O.·2013·Journal of Counseling Psychology
DOI 10.1037/a0032595
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Building on recent theory stressing multicultural orientation, as well as the development of virtues and dispositions associated with multicultural values, we introduce the construct of cultural humility, defined as having an interpersonal stance that is other-oriented rather than self-focused, characterized by respect and lack of superiority toward an individual's cultural background and experience. In 4 studies, we provide evidence for the estimated reliability and construct validity of a client-rated measure of a therapist's cultural humility, and we demonstrate that client perceptions of their therapist's cultural humility are positively associated with developing a strong working alliance. Furthermore, client perceptions of their therapist's cultural humility were positively associated with improvement in therapy, and this relationship was mediated by a strong working alliance. We consider implications for research, practice, and training.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0032595

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CHES was found to have a strong correlation (r = .84, p < 0.01) with the CHS, demonstrating convergent validity.

    “The CHES was found to have a strong (r = 84, p < 0.01) with the CHS (Hook et al., 2013), demonstrating convergent validity.”

    From Cultural humility and cultural competence in counseling: An exploratory mixed methods investigation (2023) · cites this paper as Hook et al., 2013

  • The additional variances explained by the CHES in this study were small (3%-4%), similar to Hook et al. (2013), and not all CHES sub-factors were independent significant predictors beyond the CCCI-R7.

    “Notably, the additional variances explained by the CHES in our study were small (3%-4%), which were similar to Hook et al. (2013), and not all CHES sub-factors were found to be independent significant predictors beyond the CCCI-R7 (Table 4).”

    From Cultural humility and cultural competence in counseling: An exploratory mixed methods investigation (2023) · cites this paper as Hook et al. (2013)

  • Hook et al. (2013) found that clients' perception of counselors' CC is moderately correlated (r = 0.64, p < 0.001) with their CH.

    “Hook et al.'s (2013) found that clients' perception of counselors' CC is moderately correlated (r = 0.64, p < 0.001) with their CH;”

    From Cultural humility and cultural competence in counseling: An exploratory mixed methods investigation (2023) · cites this paper as Hook et al., 2013

  • Hook et al. (2013) found that CH explained a modest (7%), but significant, amount of variance in therapeutic working alliance, above and beyond client's perception of their therapist's CC.

    “further, through hierarchical regression analyses, the authors found that CH explained a modest (7%), but significant, amount of variances in therapeutic working alliance, above and beyond client's perception of their therapist's CC.”

    From Cultural humility and cultural competence in counseling: An exploratory mixed methods investigation (2023) · cites this paper as Hook et al., 2013

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E., Owen, J., Worthington, E. L., & Utsey, S. O.
Affiliations
  • University of North Texas (US)
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2013-07
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
353-366
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
DOI
10.1037/a0032595
OpenAlex
W2070982161
Cited by
1,317
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 174 · 2025: 153 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 135 · 2022: 126 · 2021: 122 · 2020: 142 · 2019: 118 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1
FWCI
29.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
correction (2015-01-19)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • Sponsor name not included (14979)
  • University of North Texas
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
cultural humility, multicultural orientation, multicultural values, therapeutic relationship, client perceptions of therapists, treatment outcomes, cultural diversity, therapist training
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Professional-Patient Relations, Students, Patient Satisfaction, Cultural Competency, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review