Cited by 4Fluid Dynamics and MixingGranular flow and fluidized bedsMinerals Flotation and Separation Techniques

Numerical simulation of interfacial closures for 3D bubble column flows

Masood, Rao M. A., Jovicic, Vojislav, Delgado, Antonio·2015·Chemical Engineering & Technology

Abstract

Abstract Numerical investigation of flow hydrodynamics in a square cross‐sectioned bubble column was conducted in a transient Euler‐Euler environment by applying the simulation tool Ansys CFX 14.0. The influence of the drag coefficient (CD) was investigated and the results were also compared with drag force models. Furthermore, three different lift force models and a defined lift coefficient were studied. All results were compared with the available experimental data. All simulations were carried out for a single‐hole sparger with given aspect ratio (H/D) and superficial gas velocity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ceat.201400182

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masood, R. M. A., Jovicic, V., & Delgado, A.
Affiliations
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Masood, Rao M. A.
Venue
Chemical Engineering & Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-14
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
777-786
ISSN
  • 0930-7516 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4125
OpenAlex
W2012736160
Cited by
4
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Engineering & Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Granular flow and fluidized beds
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Keywords
bubble column, Euler-Eulerian two-phase model, drag coefficient, lift coefficient, gas-liquid two-phase flow, square cross-section, superficial gas velocity, aspect ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review