Cited by 131Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionMicrobial Fuel Cells and BioremediationFuel Cells and Related Materials

Facile Synthesis of MoS 2 @CNT as an Effective Catalyst for Hydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cells

Open access
Yuan, Heyang, Li, Jianyang, Yuan, Chris, He, Zhen·2014·ChemElectroChem

Abstract

Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) can produce hydrogen gas from organic compounds in an energy‐efficient way by taking advantage of the potential generated by microorganisms. However, hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) in MECs is slow and thus requires catalysts. A challenge for MEC development therefore lies in the development of cost‐effective HER catalysts. In this study, a nanocomposite with molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ) coated on highly conductive carbon nanotubes (CNTs) was synthesized as an alternative HER catalyst, and examined in an MEC for hydrogen production. Linear sweep voltammogram experiments demonstrated enhanced HER activity with increasing CNT content. The results suggest that conductivity may be the main limiting factor for overall HER catalysis by MoS 2 . MEC tests showed that MoS 2 /CNT‐90 achieved hydrogen production that was comparable to the Pt‐based catalyst. The low cost of the MoS 2 composites will make it competitive as an effective HER catalyst for future MEC applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/celc.201402150

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Carbon materials have shown great potential applications as electrocatalyst supports owing to their high conductivity and stability.

    “Carbon materials, such as porous carbon, [ 158-161 ] carbon nanofi bers, [ 162 ] carbon nanotubes [ 163-167 ] and graphene, [ 42,43,168-175 ] have shown great potential applications as electrocatalyst supports owing to their high conductivity and stability.”

    From 2D Transition‐Metal‐Dichalcogenide‐Nanosheet‐Based Composites for Photocatalytic and Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reactions (2016) · cites this paper as [164]

    The paper describes highly conductive carbon nanotubes as a support for a MoS₂ electrocatalyst and links increased CNT content to improved hydrogen-evolution activity (opening summary; Heyrovsky reaction section, page unavailable). It does not establish stability as a reason for using CNTs; its conclusion says catalyst durability remains to be investigated. This citation supports the nanotube and conductivity portion of the citing sentence, but not its stability rationale. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. G. W. Crabtree, M. S. Dresselhaus, M. V. Buchanan, Phys. Today 2004, 57, 39 -44. · DOI · Paper page
  2. K. Christopher, R. Dimitrios, Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6640 -6651. · DOI
  3. H. Liu, S. Grot, B. E. Logan, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 4317 -4320. · DOI
  4. B. E. Logan, B. Hamelers, R. Rozendal, U. Schrçder, J. Keller, S. Freguia, P. Aelterman, W. Verstraete, K. Rabaey, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 5181 -5192. · DOI
  5. B. E. Logan, D. Call, S. Cheng, H. V. M. Hamelers, T. H. J. A. Sleutels, A. W. Jeremiasse, R. A. Rozendal, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 8630 -8640. · DOI · Paper page
  6. S. Yossan, L. Xiao, P. Prasertsan, Z. He, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 9619 -9624. · DOI
  7. Y. Zhang, I. Angelidaki, Water Res. 2014, 56, 11 -25. · DOI
  8. H. Wang, F. Qian, G. Wang, Y. Jiao, Z. He, Y. Li, ACS Nano 2013, 7, 8728 - 8735. · DOI
  9. R. D. Cusick, B. Bryan, D. S. Parker, M. D. Merrill, M. Mehanna, P. D. Kiely, G. Liu, B. E. Logan, Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 89, 2053 - 2063. · DOI
  10. D. Call, B. E. Logan, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 3401 -3406. · DOI
  11. R. A. Rozendal, A. W. Jeremiasse, H. V. M. Hamelers, C. J. N. Buisman, En- viron. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 629 -634. · DOI
  12. P. Parameswaran, C. I. Torres, H.-S. Lee, R. Krajmalnik-Brown, B. E. Ritt- mann, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 103, 513 -523. · DOI
  13. P. A. Selembo, M. D. Merrill, B. E. Logan, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 428 -437. · DOI
  14. A. W. Jeremiasse, H. V. Hamelers, M. Saakes, C. J. Buisman, J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 12716 -12723. · DOI
  15. H. Hu, Y. Fan, H. Liu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34, 8535 -8542. · DOI
  16. M. Mitov, E. Chorbadzhiyska, R. Rashkov, Y. Hubenova, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 16522 -16526. · DOI
  17. Y.-X. Huang, X.-W. Liu, X.-F. Sun, G.-P. Sheng, Y.-Y. Zhang, G.-M. Yan, S.-G. Wang, A.-W. Xu, H.-Q. Yu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 2773 -2776. · DOI
  18. L. Xiao, Z. Wen, S. Ci, J. Chen, Z. He, Nano Energy 2012, 1, 751 -756. · DOI
  19. B. Hinnemann, P. G. Moses, J. Bonde, K. P. Jørgensen, J. H. Nielsen, S. Horch, I. Chorkendorff, J. K. Nørskov, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5308 - 5309. · DOI · Paper page
  20. T. F. Jaramillo, K. P. Jørgensen, J. Bonde, J. H. Nielsen, S. Horch, I. Chor- kendorff, Science 2007, 317, 100 -102. · DOI · Paper page
  21. A. B. Laursen, S. Kegnaes, S. Dahl, I. Chorkendorff, Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 5577 -5591. · DOI · Paper page
  22. H. Wang, Z. Lu, S. Xu, D. Kong, J. J. Cha, G. Zheng, P.-C. Hsu, K. Yan, D. Bradshaw, F. B. Prinz, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 19701 -19706. · DOI
  23. M. A. Lukowski, A. S. Daniel, F. Meng, A. Forticaux, L. Li, S. Jin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10274 -10277. · DOI · Paper page
  24. J. C. Tokash, B. E. Logan, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 9439 -9445. · DOI
  25. Z. Wen, S. Ci, F. Zhang, X. Feng, S. Cui, S. Mao, S. Luo, Z. He, J. Chen, Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 1399 -1404. · DOI
  26. D. Y. Chung, S.-K. Park, Y.-H. Chung, S.-H. Yu, D.-H. Lim, N. Jung, H. C. Ham, H.-Y. Park, Y. Piao, S. J. Yoo, Y.-E. Sung, Nanoscale 2014, 6, 2131. · DOI · Paper page
  27. X. Ge, L. Chen, L. Zhang, Y. Wen, A. Hirata, M. Chen, Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3100 -3104. · DOI
  28. K. Bindumadhavan, S. K. Srivastava, S. Mahanty, Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 1823 -1825. · DOI
  29. Z. He, N. Wagner, S. D. Minteer, L. T. Angenent, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 5212 -5217. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yuan, H., Li, J., Yuan, C., & He, Z.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Corresponding author
  • Yuan, Chris
  • He, Zhen
Venue
ChemElectroChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-08-05
Volume
1
Issue
11
Pages
1828-1833
ISSN
2196-0216 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079163027
Cited by
131
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ChemElectroChem (publishedVersion)
Funders
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
Keywords
MoS2, carbon nanotubes, hydrogen evolution reaction, microbial electrolysis cells, hydrogen production, electrocatalysts, catalyst conductivity, low-cost catalysts, platinum-free catalysts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review