Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 428

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Centering and scaling in component analysis

Bro, Rasmus, Smilde, Age K.·2003·Journal of Chemometrics

Abstract

In this paper the purpose and use of centering and scaling are discussed in depth. The main focus is on two‐way bilinear data analysis, but the results can easily be generalized to multiway data analysis. In fact, one of the scopes of this paper is to show that if two‐way centering and scaling are understood, then multiway centering and scaling is quite straightforward. In the literature it is often stated that preprocessing of multiway arrays is difficult, but here it is shown that most of the difficulties do not pertain to three‐ and higher‐way modeling in particular. It is shown that centering is most conveniently seen as a projection step, where the data are projected onto certain well‐defined spaces within a given mode. This view of centering helps to explain why, for example, centering data with missing elements is likely to be suboptimal if there are many missing elements. Building a model for data consists of two parts: postulating a structural model and using a method to estimate the parameters. Centering has to do with the first part: when centering, a model including offsets is postulated. Scaling has to do with the second part: when scaling, another way of fitting the model is employed. It is shown that centering is simply a convenient technique to estimate model parameters for models with certain offsets, but this does not work for all types of offsets. It is also shown that scaling is a way to fit models with a weighted least squares loss function and that sometimes this change in objective function cannot be performed by a simple scaling step. Further practical aspects of and alternatives to centering and scaling are discussed, and examples are used throughout to show that the conclusions in the paper are not only of theoretical interest but can have an impact on practical data analysis. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cem.773

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 428

Metadata

Authors
Bro, R., & Smilde, A. K.
Venue
Journal of Chemometrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
16-33
ISSN
  • 0886-9383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-128X
OpenAlex
W2085946009
Cited by
428
References
21
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Centering and scaling in component analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cem.773
The paper
Bro, R., & Smilde, A. K. (2003). Centering and scaling in component analysis. Journal of Chemometrics. https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.773

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.