Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accounting for Poisson noise in the multivariate analysis of ToF‐SIMS spectrum images

Keenan, Michael R., Kotula, Paul G.·2004·Surface and Interface Analysis

Abstract

Recent years have seen the introduction of many surface characterization instruments and other spectral imaging systems that are capable of generating data in truly prodigious quantities. The challenge faced by the analyst, then, is to extract the essential chemical information from this overwhelming volume of spectral data. Multivariate statistical techniques such as principal component analysis (PCA) and other forms of factor analysis promise to be among the most important and powerful tools for accomplishing this task. In order to benefit fully from multivariate methods, the nature of the noise specific to each measurement technique must be taken into account. For spectroscopic techniques that rely upon counting particles (photons, electrons, etc.), the observed noise is typically dominated by ‘counting statistics’ and is Poisson in nature. This implies that the absolute uncertainty in any given data point is not constant, rather, it increases with the number of counts represented by that point. Performing PCA, for instance, directly on the raw data leads to less than satisfactory results in such cases. This paper will present a simple method for weighting the data to account for Poisson noise. Using a simple time‐of‐flight secondary ion mass spectrometry spectrum image as an example, it will be demonstrated that PCA, when applied to the weighted data, leads to results that are more interpretable, provide greater noise rejection and are more robust than standard PCA. The weighting presented here is also shown to be an optimal approach to scaling data as a pretreatment prior to multivariate statistical analysis. Published in 2004 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sia.1657

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 304

Metadata

Authors
Keenan, M. R., & Kotula, P. G.
Venue
Surface and Interface Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
203-212
ISSN
  • 0142-2421 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9918
OpenAlex
W2160062394
Cited by
304
References
12
FWCI
10.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accounting for Poisson noise in the multivariate analysis of ToF‐SIMS spectrum images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sia.1657
The paper
Keenan, M. R., & Kotula, P. G. (2004). Accounting for Poisson noise in the multivariate analysis of ToF‐SIMS spectrum images. Surface and Interface Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.1657

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.