The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accounting for Poisson noise in the multivariate analysis of ToF‐SIMS spectrum images
Abstract
Recent years have seen the introduction of many surface characterization instruments and other spectral imaging systems that are capable of generating data in truly prodigious quantities. The challenge faced by the analyst, then, is to extract the essential chemical information from this overwhelming volume of spectral data. Multivariate statistical techniques such as principal component analysis (PCA) and other forms of factor analysis promise to be among the most important and powerful tools for accomplishing this task. In order to benefit fully from multivariate methods, the nature of the noise specific to each measurement technique must be taken into account. For spectroscopic techniques that rely upon counting particles (photons, electrons, etc.), the observed noise is typically dominated by ‘counting statistics’ and is Poisson in nature. This implies that the absolute uncertainty in any given data point is not constant, rather, it increases with the number of counts represented by that point. Performing PCA, for instance, directly on the raw data leads to less than satisfactory results in such cases. This paper will present a simple method for weighting the data to account for Poisson noise. Using a simple time‐of‐flight secondary ion mass spectrometry spectrum image as an example, it will be demonstrated that PCA, when applied to the weighted data, leads to results that are more interpretable, provide greater noise rejection and are more robust than standard PCA. The weighting presented here is also shown to be an optimal approach to scaling data as a pretreatment prior to multivariate statistical analysis. Published in 2004 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jolliffe, I. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa501 · Cited by 14,310
Golub, G. H., & Loan, C. F. V. (1996) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · Cited by 6,027
Green, A. A., Berman, M., Switzer, P., & Craig, M. D. (1988) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.3001 · Cited by 2,615
Blackwood, L. G., & Malinowski, E. R. (1994) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269209 · Cited by 2,210
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-0309 · Cited by 589
(2003) · Statistics in Musicology · doi:10.1201/9780203496947.ch8 · Cited by 577
Centering and scaling in component analysis
Bro, R., & Smilde, A. K. (2003) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/cem.773 · Cited by 428
Lee, J. B., Woodyatt, A. S., & Berman, M. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.54356 · Cited by 421
Geladi, P. L. M., & Grahn, H. F. (2000) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470027318.a8106 · Cited by 351
Maximum likelihood principal component analysis
Wentzell, P. D., Andrews, D. T., Hamilton, D. C., Faber, K., & Kowalski, B. R. (1997) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-128x(199707)11:4<339::aid-cem476>3.0.co;2-l · Cited by 236
Cited by
Gorrochategui, E., Jaumot, J., Lacorte, S., & Tauler, R. (2016) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2016.07.004 · Cited by 352
Unsupervised machine learning for exploratory data analysis in imaging mass spectrometry
Verbeeck, N., Caprioli, R. M., & Van de Plas, R. (2020) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21602 · Cited by 281
Nitrogen: unraveling the secret to stable carbon-supported Pt-alloy electrocatalysts
Pylypenko, S., Borisevich, A., More, K. L., Corpuz, A. R., Holme, T., Dameron, A. A., Olson, T. S., Dinh, H. N., Gennett, T., & O'Hayre, R. (2013) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c3ee40189h · Cited by 109
Kosasih, F. U., & Ducati, C. (2018) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.02.055 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Keenan, M. R., & Kotula, P. G.
- Venue
- Surface and Interface Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 203-212
- ISSN
- 0142-2421 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9918
- OpenAlex
- W2160062394
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 10.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accounting for Poisson noise in the multivariate analysis of ToF‐SIMS spectrum images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sia.1657
- The paper
- Keenan, M. R., & Kotula, P. G. (2004). Accounting for Poisson noise in the multivariate analysis of ToF‐SIMS spectrum images. Surface and Interface Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.1657
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.