Cited by 22Environmental Impact and SustainabilitySustainable Building Design and AssessmentConcrete and Cement Materials Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Aiming for life cycle sustainability assessment of cement‐based composites: A trend study for wall systems of carbon concrete: Dresden Nexus Conference 2020—Session 4—Circular economy for building with secondary construction materials to minimise resource use and land use

Open access

Abstract

The narrative sustainable building is core message of European politics. Strategies discussed in this regard concern above all material minimization by using new more efficient manufacturing technologies, new form finding approaches for load‐bearing structures or new high‐performance materials. The goal of the research project V2.10, funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, refers to the latter by assessing the sustainability potential of building components made of innovative textile reinforced concrete. We conceptualized a life cycle sustainability assessment framework and applied it to variants of sandwich wall systems made of carbon concrete composites and steel‐reinforced concrete. Results indicate hotspots in technology and material choices that could be addressed by circular strategies, for example, refuse, reduce or recycling. Overall, one design variant made of carbon concrete composites is the best performing with respect to all dimensions of sustainability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cend.202000024

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 62 · Cited by 22

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. 10.1111/jiec.12690 · DOI
  2. 10.3390/su2103309 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.1259855 · DOI · Paper page
  4. German Advisory Council On Global Change (WBGU), 2016, Der Umzug der Menschheit: Die transformative Kraft der Städte [only in German]
  5. Randers J, 2018, Transformation is feasible. How to achieve the sustainable development goals within planetary boundaries
  6. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Potting J, 2017, 2544: Circular economy: measuring innovation in the product chain
  8. 10.1504/IJMPT.2005.007727 · DOI
  9. Favier A, 2018, A sustainable future for the European cement and concrete industry – Technology assessment for full decarbonisation of the industry by 2050
  10. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.309 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/978-3-319-56797-6 · DOI
  12. De Brito J, 2020, The past and future of sustainable concrete: A critical review and new strategies on cement‐based materials, J Clean Prod, 123558
  13. 2006, 36: State‐of‐the‐Art Report of RILEM TC 201‐TRC: Textile reinforced concrete
  14. 10.1201/b17063-323 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/best.201400056 · DOI
  16. Curbach M, 2017, Eine Vision wird Realität: Der Betonbau der Zukunft ist nachhaltig, leicht, flexibel und formbar ‐ dank Carbon. Für Sanierung oder Neubau sind jetzt Decken und Wände, Fuß‐ und Radwegbrücken, Bögen [only in German], Der Prüfingenieur, 51, 20
  17. 10.1002/best.200800653 · DOI
  18. Müller E, 2019, Material and space saving carbon concrete elements, Civil Eng Des, 1, 3
  19. Speck K, 2020, Loop‐shaped elements for anchoring carbon reinforcement in concrete, Civil Eng Des, 2
  20. 10.1002/best.201200034 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.051 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s11367-019-01586-x · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s11367-016-1168-8 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Otto J, 2019, Carbonbeton und Stahlbeton im wirtschaftlichen Vergleich, Bauingenieur, 94, 246, 10.37544/0005-6650-2019-06-80 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s11367-011-0264-z · DOI
  26. 10.1201/b15002-37 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/s11740-018-0802-7 · DOI
  28. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001160 · DOI
  29. Hülsmeier F, 2013, vakutex ‐ Vacuum‐insulated textile concrete facade elements
  30. 10.3390/ma12193194 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124300 · DOI
  32. 10.1617/s11527-018-1249-1 · DOI
  33. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01026 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.07.016 · DOI
  35. Fink A, Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. 5
  36. 10.2307/j.ctt1t892t3.7 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Elkington J, 2018, 25 years ago I coined the phrase “triple bottom line.” Here's why It's time to rethink it, Harv Bus Rev, 25
  39. 10.1080/09613218.2017.1356126 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1007/s11367-017-1270-6 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.214 · DOI
  43. 10.1007/s11367-017-1284-0 · DOI
  44. 10.1065/lca2008.02.376 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1007/s11367-015-0917-4 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.435 · DOI
  47. Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (BBSR), 2017, Nutzungsdauern von Bauteilen für Lebenszyklusanalysen nach Bewertungssystem Nachhaltiges Bauen (BNB) [only in German]
  48. 10.1201/9780429426506-266 · DOI
  49. Karl Meyer AG, 2020, CFK Valley Stade Recycling GmbH & co.
  50. Graubner C‐A, 2016, Zwanzig20 – Carbon Concrete Composite C3
  51. Grauer O, 2017, Zwanzig20 – Carbon Concrete Composite C3
  52. 10.1002/best.201700058 · DOI
  53. 10.1007/s11367-013-0670-5 · DOI
  54. 10.1201/9781420054736 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Swarr TE, 2011, Environmental life cycle costing: A code of practice
  56. 10.1257/aer.91.1.260 · DOI
  57. 10.1007/s11367-011-0301-y · DOI
  58. UNEP/SETAC LIFE CYCLE INITIATIVE, 2009, Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products
  59. UNEP/SETAC LIFE CYCLE INITIATIVE, 2013, The methodological sheets for subcategories in social life cycle assessment (S‐LCA)
  60. Goedkoop M, 2018, Version 1.0: Product Social Impact Assessment Methodology Report
  61. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.10.016 · DOI
  62. Souto F, 2018, Lignin‐based carbon fiber: A current overview, Mater Res Exp, 5
  63. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01408 · DOI
  64. Bringezu S, 2015, Raw material supply and resource productivity in the German cement industry: Analysis of the status quo and perspectives [only in German]
  65. Kisic M, 2018, Building pressure. Which cement companies will be left behind in the low‐carbon transition?
  66. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135054 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.144 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.008 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.061 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.139 · DOI
  71. BADISCHE STAHLWERKE GMBH (BSW). EPD‐BS‐10.2, 2018, Betonstahl (EPD‐BS‐10.2). Umweltproduktdeklaration nach ISO 14025 und EN 15804 [only in German]
  72. ÖKOBAUDAT, 2018, ECO EPD ref. no. 00000616: oekobau.dat Process Data set: Reinforcement steel wire; wire (en)
  73. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.10.006 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Scope, C., Guenther, E., Schütz, J., Mielecke, T., Mündecke, E., Schultze, K., & Saling, P.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Institute for Integrated Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources (DE)
  • LCEE Life Cycle Engineeering Experts GmbH Darmstadt Germany
  • Ingenierbüro Grassl GmbH Berlin Germany
  • BASF (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Guenther, Edeltraud
Venue
Civil Engineering Design
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12
Volume
2
Issue
5-6
Pages
143-158
ISSN
2625-073X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3109324159
Cited by
22
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Civil Engineering Design (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Keywords
life cycle sustainability assessment, textile reinforced concrete, steel reinforced concrete, circular economy, sustainable construction, material recycling, resource utilization (natural resources), land use, architectural elements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aiming for life cycle sustainability assessment of cement‐based composites: A trend study for wall systems of carbon concrete: Dresden Nexus Conference 2020—Session 4—Circular economy for building with secondary construction materials to minimise resource use and land use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cend.202000024
The paper
Scope, C., Guenther, E., Schütz, J., Mielecke, T., Mündecke, E., Schultze, K., & Saling, P. (2020). Aiming for life cycle sustainability assessment of cement‐based composites: A trend study for wall systems of carbon concrete: Dresden Nexus Conference 2020—Session 4—Circular economy for building with secondary construction materials to minimise resource use and land use. Civil Engineering Design. https://doi.org/10.1002/cend.202000024