The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Aiming for life cycle sustainability assessment of cement‐based composites: A trend study for wall systems of carbon concrete: Dresden Nexus Conference 2020—Session 4—Circular economy for building with secondary construction materials to minimise resource use and land use
Open accessAbstract
The narrative sustainable building is core message of European politics. Strategies discussed in this regard concern above all material minimization by using new more efficient manufacturing technologies, new form finding approaches for load‐bearing structures or new high‐performance materials. The goal of the research project V2.10, funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, refers to the latter by assessing the sustainability potential of building components made of innovative textile reinforced concrete. We conceptualized a life cycle sustainability assessment framework and applied it to variants of sandwich wall systems made of carbon concrete composites and steel‐reinforced concrete. Results indicate hotspots in technology and material choices that could be addressed by circular strategies, for example, refuse, reduce or recycling. Overall, one design variant made of carbon concrete composites is the best performing with respect to all dimensions of sustainability.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Whereas fully wood-based building systems outperform steel-reinforced concrete systems normally in the range of 10-55% in most environmental impact categories”
In the citing paper
“the case of wood-concrete systems may differ as they in some cases exhibit even higher environmental impacts as they lack in optimized substitution of cement [52-57].”
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 62 · Cited by 22
Research works printed but not linked: 73
- 10.1111/jiec.12690 · DOI
- 10.3390/su2103309 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1259855 · DOI · Paper page
- German Advisory Council On Global Change (WBGU), 2016, Der Umzug der Menschheit: Die transformative Kraft der Städte [only in German]
- Randers J, 2018, Transformation is feasible. How to achieve the sustainable development goals within planetary boundaries
- 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · DOI · Paper page
- Potting J, 2017, 2544: Circular economy: measuring innovation in the product chain
- 10.1504/IJMPT.2005.007727 · DOI
- Favier A, 2018, A sustainable future for the European cement and concrete industry – Technology assessment for full decarbonisation of the industry by 2050
- 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.309 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-56797-6 · DOI
- De Brito J, 2020, The past and future of sustainable concrete: A critical review and new strategies on cement‐based materials, J Clean Prod, 123558
- 2006, 36: State‐of‐the‐Art Report of RILEM TC 201‐TRC: Textile reinforced concrete
- 10.1201/b17063-323 · DOI
- 10.1002/best.201400056 · DOI
- Curbach M, 2017, Eine Vision wird Realität: Der Betonbau der Zukunft ist nachhaltig, leicht, flexibel und formbar ‐ dank Carbon. Für Sanierung oder Neubau sind jetzt Decken und Wände, Fuß‐ und Radwegbrücken, Bögen [only in German], Der Prüfingenieur, 51, 20
- 10.1002/best.200800653 · DOI
- Müller E, 2019, Material and space saving carbon concrete elements, Civil Eng Des, 1, 3
- Speck K, 2020, Loop‐shaped elements for anchoring carbon reinforcement in concrete, Civil Eng Des, 2
- 10.1002/best.201200034 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.051 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11367-019-01586-x · DOI
- 10.1007/s11367-016-1168-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Otto J, 2019, Carbonbeton und Stahlbeton im wirtschaftlichen Vergleich, Bauingenieur, 94, 246, 10.37544/0005-6650-2019-06-80 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11367-011-0264-z · DOI
- 10.1201/b15002-37 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11740-018-0802-7 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001160 · DOI
- Hülsmeier F, 2013, vakutex ‐ Vacuum‐insulated textile concrete facade elements
- 10.3390/ma12193194 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124300 · DOI
- 10.1617/s11527-018-1249-1 · DOI
- 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01026 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.07.016 · DOI
- Fink A, Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. 5
- 10.2307/j.ctt1t892t3.7 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · DOI · Paper page
- Elkington J, 2018, 25 years ago I coined the phrase “triple bottom line.” Here's why It's time to rethink it, Harv Bus Rev, 25
- 10.1080/09613218.2017.1356126 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11367-017-1270-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.214 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11367-017-1284-0 · DOI
- 10.1065/lca2008.02.376 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11367-015-0917-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.435 · DOI
- Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (BBSR), 2017, Nutzungsdauern von Bauteilen für Lebenszyklusanalysen nach Bewertungssystem Nachhaltiges Bauen (BNB) [only in German]
- 10.1201/9780429426506-266 · DOI
- Karl Meyer AG, 2020, CFK Valley Stade Recycling GmbH & co.
- Graubner C‐A, 2016, Zwanzig20 – Carbon Concrete Composite C3
- Grauer O, 2017, Zwanzig20 – Carbon Concrete Composite C3
- 10.1002/best.201700058 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11367-013-0670-5 · DOI
- 10.1201/9781420054736 · DOI · Paper page
- Swarr TE, 2011, Environmental life cycle costing: A code of practice
- 10.1257/aer.91.1.260 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11367-011-0301-y · DOI
- UNEP/SETAC LIFE CYCLE INITIATIVE, 2009, Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products
- UNEP/SETAC LIFE CYCLE INITIATIVE, 2013, The methodological sheets for subcategories in social life cycle assessment (S‐LCA)
- Goedkoop M, 2018, Version 1.0: Product Social Impact Assessment Methodology Report
- 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.10.016 · DOI
- Souto F, 2018, Lignin‐based carbon fiber: A current overview, Mater Res Exp, 5
- 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01408 · DOI
- Bringezu S, 2015, Raw material supply and resource productivity in the German cement industry: Analysis of the status quo and perspectives [only in German]
- Kisic M, 2018, Building pressure. Which cement companies will be left behind in the low‐carbon transition?
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135054 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.144 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.061 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.139 · DOI
- BADISCHE STAHLWERKE GMBH (BSW). EPD‐BS‐10.2, 2018, Betonstahl (EPD‐BS‐10.2). Umweltproduktdeklaration nach ISO 14025 und EN 15804 [only in German]
- ÖKOBAUDAT, 2018, ECO EPD ref. no. 00000616: oekobau.dat Process Data set: Reinforcement steel wire; wire (en)
- 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.10.006 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Scope, C., Guenther, E., Schütz, J., Mielecke, T., Mündecke, E., Schultze, K., & Saling, P.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
- Institute for Integrated Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources (DE)
- LCEE Life Cycle Engineeering Experts GmbH Darmstadt Germany
- Ingenierbüro Grassl GmbH Berlin Germany
- BASF (Germany) (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Guenther, Edeltraud
- Venue
- Civil Engineering Design
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 143-158
- ISSN
- 2625-073X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3109324159
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Civil Engineering Design (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Keywords
- life cycle sustainability assessment, textile reinforced concrete, steel reinforced concrete, circular economy, sustainable construction, material recycling, resource utilization (natural resources), land use, architectural elements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aiming for life cycle sustainability assessment of cement‐based composites: A trend study for wall systems of carbon concrete: Dresden Nexus Conference 2020—Session 4—Circular economy for building with secondary construction materials to minimise resource use and land use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cend.202000024
- The paper
- Scope, C., Guenther, E., Schütz, J., Mielecke, T., Mündecke, E., Schultze, K., & Saling, P. (2020). Aiming for life cycle sustainability assessment of cement‐based composites: A trend study for wall systems of carbon concrete: Dresden Nexus Conference 2020—Session 4—Circular economy for building with secondary construction materials to minimise resource use and land use. Civil Engineering Design. https://doi.org/10.1002/cend.202000024