21.03: Reusability indicator for steel‐framed buildings and application for an industrial hall
Abstract
This paper introduces a new method for the assessment of reusability of components and structures of steel‐framed buildings. It enables classification of various building parts and products through a procedure to calculate, weight and aggregate recyclability indicators and thus it helps to explore their potential to a second life. In connection with life cycle analysis (LCA), such an indicator provides valuable information for the Module D of the European standard EN 15804 and the Environmental Product Declarations. The method is applied on an existing typical industrial hall structure. Five different end‐of‐life scenarios were investigated for selected components, including recycling of the material as scrap, but also the careful deconstruction with components prepared for future reuse after cleaning, sorting, inspection and packaging. As an example, both cost and environmental burdens are compared in the life‐cycle study of a selected girder. The results clearly show the significant reduction of environmental impacts achieved with reuse. However, we conclude that the reuse processes could be made more competitive with further reduction of life cycle costs. The higher reuse costs originate from the quality checks, manual work during deconstruction, storage and long transport distances. Adoption of cost effective deconstruction, sorting and inspection technologies can significantly improve the economic benefits in the studied reuse scenarios.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hradil et al. (2017) introduced a new method for reusability assessment of components and structures of steel-framed buildings.
“Hradil et al. (2017) introduced a new method for the reusability assessment of components and structures of steel-framed buildings.”
From Reuse of Steel in the Construction Industry: Challenges and Opportunities (2023) · cites this paper as Hradil et al., 2017
Approximately 60% of the steel structural elements are suited for reuse, and up to 70% of the environmental impact can be reduced if only the rafters of the structure are reused 1.46 times on average compared to the scenario without reuse.
“The result shows that approximately 60% of the steel structural elements are suited for reuse, and up to 70% of the environmental impact can be reduced if only the rafters of the structure are reused 1.46 times on average compared to the scenario without reuse.”
From Reuse of Steel in the Construction Industry: Challenges and Opportunities (2023) · cites this paper as Hradil et al., 2017
Cites
Understanding and overcoming the barriers to structural steel reuse, a UK perspective
Densley Tingley, D., Cooper, S., & Cullen, J. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.006 · Cited by 261 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This classification can be seen as extension of the “building - component system - element” concept presented in [10].”
BackgroundDefining closed-loop material cycle construction
Sassi, P. (2008) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/09613210801994208 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Material savings through structural steel reuse: A case study in Genoa
Pongiglione, M., & Calderini, C. (2014) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.02.011 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Webster, M. D., Gumpertz, S., & Costello, D. T. (2005) · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Reuse system of building steel structures
Fujita, M., & Iwata, M. (2006) · Structure and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1080/15732470600720351 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Environmental emissions and energy use from the structural steel erection process: a case study
Haney, J. H., Guggemos, A. A., Criswell, M., & Clevenger, C. (2007) · Digital Collections of Colorado (Colorado State University) · doi:10.25675/3.023596 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Embodied energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules for a multi-residential building
Ngo, T., Crawford, R., Gammampila, G., Aye, L., & Mendis, P. A. (2009) · Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digitizing material passport for sustainable construction projects using BIM
Atta, I., Bakhoum, E. S., & Marzouk, M. M. (2021) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103233 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Reducing embodied carbon in structural systems: A review of early-stage design strategies
Fang, D. L., Brown, N. C., Wolf, C. D., & Mueller, C. (2023) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107054 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Reuse of Steel in the Construction Industry: Challenges and Opportunities
Kanyilmaz, A., Birhane, M., Fishwick, R., & del Castillo, C. (2023) · International Journal of Steel Structures · doi:10.1007/s13296-023-00778-4 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Rakhshan, K., Morel, J.-C., & Daneshkhah, A. (2021) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102791 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Kim, S.-J., & Kim, S.-A. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135343 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Disassembly calculation criteria and methods for circular construction
Attia, S., Al-Obaidy, M., Mori, M., Campain, C., Giannasi, E., van Vliet, M., & Gasparri, E. (2024) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105521 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Bartsch, H. (2025) · Structures · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110057 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Grüter, C., Gordon, M., Muster, M., Kastner, F., Grönquist, P., Frangi, A., Langenberg, S., & Wolf, C. D. (2023) · Frontiers in Built Environment · doi:10.3389/fbuil.2023.1307632 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Reusability of components from single‐storey steel‐framed buildings
Hradil, P., Fülöp, L., & Ungureanu, V. (2019) · Steel Construction · doi:10.1002/stco.201800032 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationMelella, R., Ruocco, G. D., & Sorvillo, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13168815 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Modulares Wiederverwenden von Bestandstragwerken
Mark, P., Sanio, D., Balzani, D., Curoșu, I., Hafner, A., König, M., Kuhlenkötter, B., Thewes, M., Baille, W., Hackl, K., et al. (2025) · Bautechnik · doi:10.1002/bate.70000 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Fang, D. L., & Mueller, C. (2021) · Architecture Structures and Construction · doi:10.1007/s44150-021-00018-5 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Evaluating material passports for circularity in the construction industry
Mao, S.-Y., & Cao, W.-J. (2025) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2024.12.021 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Psilovikos, T. (2023) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1196/1/012040 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Integration of Design and Performance Evaluation for Reusable Osteomorphic-Block Masonry
Harsono, K., Shih, S.-G., Wagiri, F., & Alfred, W. (2023) · Nexus Network Journal · doi:10.1007/s00004-023-00756-7 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Upcycling Strategies for Resilience Reconstruction Goals: A Case Study of an Italian Public Building
Tajani, F., Bologna, A., Cerullo, G., Doko, E., & Sica, F. (2025) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings15203683 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Harsunen, P., Uotila, U., Joensuu, T., & Saari, A. (2025) · Environmental Research Infrastructure and Sustainability · doi:10.1088/2634-4505/adcd27 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Ottenhaus, L.-M., Hernández-Aldaz, M., Davies, A., & Cabrero, J. M. (2025) · Wood Material Science and Engineering · doi:10.1080/17480272.2025.2510562 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
A steel element reuse ontology for building audits in circular construction
Schönfelder, L., Byers, B. S., Honic, M., & Wolf, C. D. (2025) · Developments in the Built Environment · doi:10.1016/j.dibe.2025.100638 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Recovery and Reuse of Salvaged Products and Building Materials from Existing Structures
Ungureanu, V., Fohl, F., Yang, J., Hechler, O., Rajčić, V., & Buzatu, R. (2024) · Springer tracts in civil engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73490-8_5 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationMañes-Navarrete, D., Santafé, M. R., & Payá-Zaforteza, I. (2025) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115765 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Laghi, V., Babovic, N., Laccone, F., Malomo, L., Savino, E., & Gasparini, G. (2026) · Structures · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2026.111942 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Harsono, K., Alfred, W., Wagiri, F., Aung, Y. Y., Cheng, T.-W., Basyaruddin, B., & Shih, S.-G. (2025) · Architectural Engineering and Design Management · doi:10.1080/17452007.2025.2496490 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Toward complete circular reuse: A database system for reclaimed precast concrete elements
Matthews, B., Vargas, J. H., Vullings, M., Dervishaj, A., Jonker‐Hoffrén, P., Alkki, L., & Wijte, S. N. M. (2026) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2026.106983
Clepe, A. D., & Szalai, V. (2025) · Proceedings of the Romanian Academy Series A Mathematics Physics Technical Sciences Information Science · doi:10.59277/pra-ser.a.26.3.08
- Authors
- Hradil, P., Talja, A., Ungureanu, V., Koukkari, H., & Fülöp, L.
- Affiliations
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
- Politehnica University of Timisoara (RO)
- Corresponding author
- Hradil, Petr
- Venue
- ce/papers
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 4512-4521
- ISSN
- 2509-7075 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2756063539
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ce/papers (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- steel frame buildings, industrial hall, building reuse, deconstruction, recyclability, environmental product declarations, life cycle assessment, life cycle cost, steel beams, end-of-life scenarios, material recycling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
