Cited by 69Sustainable Building Design and AssessmentSustainable Design and DevelopmentRecycled Aggregate Concrete Performance

Material savings through structural steel reuse: A case study in Genoa

Pongiglione, M., Calderini, C.·2014·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.02.011

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pongiglione and Calderini (2014) found that reusing steel in a theoretical train station design in Italy could save 30% of new steel, equating to a 30% saving in embodied energy and carbon, estimated at 2915 GJ and 138 TCO2e respectively.

    “Comparing two designs, one with new steel, and one with a combination of new and reused steel, a 30% saving in use of new steel was identified.This equated to a 30% saving in embodied energy and carbon, estimated at 2915GJ and 138 TCO2e respectively.”

    From Understanding and overcoming the barriers to structural steel reuse, a UK perspective (2017) · cites this paper as Pongiglione and Calderini, (2014)

  • Reusing recovered components, such as structural components, to serve the same purpose has a positive impact on the success of reuse.

    “Some articles advise that reusing the recovered components, such as the structural components, to serve the same purpose (for instance, similar loads) has a positive impact on the success of this intervention (Gorgolewski, 2008; Gorgolewski et al., 2008; Pongiglione and Calderini, 2014).”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Pongiglione and Calderini, 2014

  • Availability of information about the characteristics, details, certificates and drawings of recovered building components can positively contribute to increasing reuse rates.

    “According to Gorgolewski (2008), Gorgolewski et al. (2008) and Pongiglione and Calderini (2014), the availability of information about the characteristics, details, certificates and drawings of the recovered building components can positively contribute to increasing the reuse rates as well.”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Pongiglione and Calderini (2014)

  • Deconstruction instead of demolition can enhance the reusability of the recovered components.

    “Based on the reviewed articles, deconstruction instead of demolition can enhance the reusability of the recovered components (Gorgolewski et al., 2008; Hglmeier et al., 2013; Pongiglione and Calderini, 2014; Yeung et al., 2015 (among others)).”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Pongiglione and Calderini, 2014

  • To secure safety, new components should be over-dimensioned, resulting in overdesigned structures.

    “However, to secure the safety of such structures, the new components should be over-dimensioned, which eventually results in overdesigned structures (Brütting et al., 2019; Gorgolewski, 2008; Gorgolewski et al., 2008; Pongiglione and Calderini, 2014).”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Pongiglione and Calderini, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pongiglione, M., & Calderini, C.
Affiliations
University of Genoa (IT)
Corresponding author
Pongiglione, M.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
86
Pages
87-92
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070826998
Cited by
69
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Keywords
construction and demolition waste, railway station design, industrial building reuse, sustainable design, Genoa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review