Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

o‐Nitrobenzyl Photolabile Protecting Groups with Red‐Shifted Absorption: Syntheses and Uncaging Cross‐Sections for One‐ and Two‐Photon Excitation

Aujard, Isabelle, Benbrahim, Chouaha, Gouget, Marine, Ruel, Odile, Baudin, Jean‐Bernard, Neveu, Pierre, Jullien, Ludovic·2006·Chemistry – A European Journal

Abstract

We evaluated the o‐nitrobenzyl platform for designing photolabile protecting groups with red‐shifted absorption that could be photolyzed upon one‐ and two‐photon excitation. Several synthetic pathways to build different conjugated o‐nitrobenzyl backbones, as well as to vary the benzylic position, are reported. Relative to the reference 4,5‐dimethoxy‐2‐nitrobenzyl group, several o‐nitrobenzyl derivatives exhibit a large and red‐shifted one‐photon absorption within the near‐UV range. Uncaging after one‐photon excitation was studied by measuring UV‐visible absorption and steady‐state fluorescence emission on model caged ethers and esters. In the whole series investigated, the caged substrates were released cleanly upon photolysis. Quantum yields of uncaging after one‐photon absorption lie within the 0.1–1 % range. We observed that these drop as the maximum wavelength absorption of the o‐nitrobenzyl protecting group is increased. A new method based on fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) after two‐photon excitation was used to measure the action uncaging cross section for two‐photon excitation. The series of o‐nitrobenzyl caged fluorescent coumarins investigated exhibit values within the 0.1–0.01 Goeppert–Mayer (GM) range. Such results are in line with the low quantum yields of uncaging associated with cross‐sections of 1–50 GM for two‐photon absorption. Although the cross‐sections for one‐ and two‐photon absorption of o‐nitrobenzyl photolabile protecting groups can be readily improved, we emphasize the difficulty in enlarging the corresponding action uncaging cross‐sections in view of the observed trend of their quantum yield of uncaging.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/chem.200501393

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Aujard, I., Benbrahim, C., Gouget, M., Ruel, O., Baudin, J., Neveu, P., & Jullien, L.
Venue
Chemistry – A European Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-08-29
Volume
12
Issue
26
Pages
6865-6879
ISSN
  • 0947-6539 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3765
OpenAlex
W2169175469
Cited by
299
References
35
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: o‐Nitrobenzyl Photolabile Protecting Groups with Red‐Shifted Absorption: Syntheses and Uncaging Cross‐Sections for One‐ and Two‐Photon Excitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/chem.200501393
The paper
Aujard, I., Benbrahim, C., Gouget, M., Ruel, O., Baudin, J., Neveu, P., & Jullien, L. (2006). o‐Nitrobenzyl Photolabile Protecting Groups with Red‐Shifted Absorption: Syntheses and Uncaging Cross‐Sections for One‐ and Two‐Photon Excitation. Chemistry – A European Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200501393

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.