The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Substrate Specificity of Fluoroacetate Dehalogenase: An Insight from Crystallographic Analysis, Fluorescence Spectroscopy, and Theoretical Computations
Abstract
The high substrate specificity of fluoroacetate dehalogenase was explored by using crystallographic analysis, fluorescence spectroscopy, and theoretical computations. A crystal structure for the Asp104Ala mutant of the enzyme from Burkholderia sp. FA1 complexed with fluoroacetate was determined at 1.2 Å resolution. The orientation and conformation of bound fluoroacetate is different from those in the crystal structure of the corresponding Asp110Asn mutant of the enzyme from Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGA009 reported recently (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7461). The fluorescence of the tryptophan residues of the wild‐type and Trp150Phe mutant enzymes from Burkholderia sp. FA1 incubated with fluoroacetate and chloroacetate was measured to gain information on the environment of the tryptophan residues. The environments of the tryptophan residues were found to be different between the fluoroacetate‐ and chloroacetate‐bound enzymes; this would come from different binding modes of these two substrates in the active site. Docking simulations and QM/MM optimizations were performed to predict favorable conformations and orientations of the substrates. The F atom of the substrate is oriented toward Arg108 in the most stable enzyme–fluoroacetate complex. This is a stable but unreactive conformation, in which the small OCF angle is not suitable for the S N 2 displacement of the F− ion. The cleavage of the CF bond is initiated by the conformational change of the substrate to a near attack conformation (NAC) in the active site. The second lowest energy conformation is appropriate for NAC; the CO distance and the OCF angle are reasonable for the S N 2 reaction. The activation energy is greatly reduced in this conformation because of three hydrogen bonds between the leaving F atom and surrounding amino acid residues. Chloroacetate cannot reach the reactive conformation, due to the longer CCl bond; this results in an increase of the activation energy despite the weaker CCl bond.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The C-F bond is not uniformly recalcitrant to microbial disruption.
“Yet, as previously discussed, molecules such as fluoroacetate (Goldman, 1965; Nakayama et al., 2012) and various fluoronitrobenzenes (Zhao et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2019) are relatively reactive, or can be activated, and are readily biodegraded by microbes, so the C–F bond is not uniformly recalcitrant to microbial disruption.”
From Nothing lasts forever: understanding microbial biodegradation of polyfluorinated compounds and perfluorinated alkyl substances (2022) · cites this paper as Nakayama et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
Mapping the reaction coordinates of enzymatic defluorination
Chan, P. W. Y., Yakunin, A. F., Edwards, E. A., & Pai, E. F. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja200277d · Cited by 107
Biodegradation and biotransformation of organofluorine compounds
Murphy, C. D. (2010) · Biotechnology Letters · doi:10.1007/s10529-009-0174-3 · Cited by 93
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 59
- 10.7164/antibiotics.39.259 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)84704-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/AEM.64.9.3496-3498.1998 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.164.3884.1123 · DOI
- 10.1039/b919371p · DOI
- 10.1271/bbb.100746 · DOI
- Liu J. Q., 1994, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 60, 2389, 10.1128/aem.60.7.2389-2393.1994 · DOI
- Motosugi K., 1982, J. Bacteriol., 150, 522, 10.1128/jb.150.2.522-527.1982 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.163.2.635-639.1985 · DOI
- 10.1099/00221287-138-7-1317 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1381-1177(03)00098-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10529-008-9849-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/JB.01654-08 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.273.47.30897 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/chem.200801813 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0076-6879(73)27035-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0076-6879(04)80006-5 · DOI
- 10.1038/363693a0 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8417 · DOI
- 10.1021/ci970290b · DOI
- 10.1021/ja039093l · DOI
- 10.1021/ja046553h · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.21523 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.438955 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jcc.540040303 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.472902 · DOI
- 10.1080/00268977000101561 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.06.011 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1469 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja00204a001 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.20261 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja012230z · DOI
- 10.1021/ar960131y · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.97.18.9937 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja980162j · DOI
- 10.1021/j100176a093 · DOI
- 10.1021/jp984440c · DOI
- 10.1110/ps.036335.108 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.20660 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.22102 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.540130714 · DOI
- 10.1016/0166-1280(93)87147-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1074-5521(96)90164-7 · DOI
- 10.1021/ci700285e · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19981115)19:14<1612::AID-JCC7>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19981115)19:14<1623::AID-JCC8>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.10306 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.20701 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
- 10.1021/bk-1998-0712.ch004 · DOI
- 10.1016/0009-2614(89)85118-8 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.38.3098 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.464913 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1139/p80-159 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.463096 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.467146 · DOI
- 10.1021/jp9536514 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0263-7855(96)00043-4 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wackett, L. P. (2022) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/1751-7915.13928 · Cited by 165
Hu, M., & Scott, C. (2024) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00157-24 · Cited by 63
Dodge, A. G., Thoma, C. J., O’Connor, M. R., & Wackett, L. P. (2024) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02785-23 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakayama, T., Kamachi, T., Jitsumori, K., Omi, R., Hirotsu, K., Esaki, N., Kurihara, T., & Yoshizawa, K.
- Venue
- Chemistry – A European Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 8392-8402
- ISSN
- 0947-6539
- 1521-3765
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review