Cited by 43Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMetal-Catalyzed Oxygenation MechanismsMetal complexes synthesis and properties

Impact of N‐Truncated Aβ Peptides on Cu‐ and Cu(Aβ)‐Generated ROS: CuI Matters!

Open access
Esmieu, Charlène, Ferrand, Guillaume, Borghesani, Valentina, Hureau, Christelle·2021·Chemistry – A European Journal

Abstract

In vitro Cu(Aβ 1–x)‐induced ROS production has been extensively studied. Conversely, the ability of N‐truncated isoforms of Aβ to alter the Cu‐induced ROS production has been overlooked, even though they are main constituents of amyloid plaques found in the human brain. N‐Truncated peptides at the positions 4 and 11 (Aβ 4–x and Aβ 11–x) contain an amino‐terminal copper and nickel (ATCUN) binding motif (H 2 N‐Xxx‐Zzz‐His) that confer them different coordination sites and higher affinities for Cu II compared to the Aβ 1–x peptide. It has further been proposed that the role of Aβ 4–x peptide is to quench Cu II toxicity in the brain. However, the role of Cu I coordination has not been investigated to date. In contrast to Cu II, Cu I coordination is expected to be the same for N‐truncated and N‐intact peptides. Herein, we report in‐depth characterizations and ROS production studies of Cu (Cu I and Cu II) complexes of the Aβ 4–16 and Aβ 11–16 N‐truncated peptides. Our findings show that the N‐truncated peptides do produce ROS when Cu I is present in the medium, albeit to a lesser extent than the unmodified counterpart. In addition, when used as competitor ligands (i.e., in the presence of Aβ 1–16), the N‐truncated peptides are not able to fully preclude Cu(Aβ 1–16)‐induced ROS production.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/chem.202003949

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Esmieu, C., Ferrand, G., Borghesani, V., & Hureau, C.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Esmieu, Charlène
  • Hureau, Christelle
Venue
Chemistry – A European Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12-14
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
1777-1786
ISSN
  • 0947-6539 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3765
OpenAlex
W3092978833
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemistry - A European Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Research Council (StG638712)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (PCOFUND-GA-2013-609102)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Metal complexes synthesis and properties
Keywords
amyloid-beta, copper(I) complexes, copper(II) complexes, reactive oxygen species, copper binding, ATCUN motif, amyloid plaques, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Copper, Humans, Peptide Fragments, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Reactive Oxygen Species, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review