Cited by 69Social Media in Health EducationInnovations in Medical EducationWeb and Library Services

“Friending Facebook?” A Minicourse on the Use of Social Media by Health Professionals

George, Daniel R.·2011·Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Health professionals are working in an era of social technologies that empower users to generate content in real time. This article describes a 3-part continuing education minicourse called "Friending Facebook?" undertaken at Penn State Hershey Medical Center that aimed to model the functionality of current technologies in health care and encourage discussion about how health professionals might responsibly utilize social media. METHODS: Fifteen health professionals participated in the course and provided written evaluation at its conclusion. The course instructor took field notes during each of the 3 classes to document emergent themes. RESULTS: The course received uniformly positive evaluations, and participants identified several current tools perceived as being potentially useful in their professional lives, including news aggregators, Google Alerts, and--if used responsibly--social networking sites such as Facebook. DISCUSSION: Developing innovative and appropriate programming that teaches to emerging social media technologies and ideologies will be crucial to helping the health professions adapt to a new, networked era. Medical institutions would do well to foster interprofessional-and perhaps even intergenerational-conversations to share not only the dangers and risks of social media, but also the opportunities that are emerging out of a rapidly evolving online world.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/chp.20129

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traditional medicine culture emphasizes privacy, confidentiality, one-on-one interaction, and professional conduct, while social media culture emphasizes openness, informality, transparency, and connection.

    “There is a distinct difference between the culture of traditional medicine which values privacy, confidentiality, one-on-one interactions and professional conduct and that of social media which values openness, informality and transparency, connection.25”

    From Social media and Internet usage of orthopaedic surgeons (2017) · cites this paper as [25]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
George, D. R.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
George, Daniel R.
Venue
Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
Published
2011
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
215-219
ISSN
0894-1912 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000197252
Cited by
69
References
8
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web and Library Services
Keywords
social media, healthcare workers, Facebook, continuing education, minicourse, professional responsibility, news aggregators, Google Alerts, social networking sites, health professions education, interprofessional communication
MeSH terms
Curriculum, Education, Medical, Continuing, Humans, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review