Cited by 112Fluid Dynamics and MixingFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsCavitation Phenomena in Pumps

Flow Generated by an Aerated Rushton Impeller: Two-phase PIV Experiments and Numerical Simulations

Deen, Niels G., Solberg, Tron, Hjertager, Bjørn H.·2002·The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering

Abstract

Abstract A two‐camera PIV technique was used to obtain angle resolved velocity and turbulence data of the flow in a lab‐scale stirred tank, equipped with a Rushton turbine. Two cases were investigated: a single‐phase flow and a gas‐liquid flow. In the former case, the classical radial jet flow pattern accompanied by two trailing vortices was observed. In the latter case, the velocity of the radial jet was reduced, and the vortices were diminished by the presence of the gas. Gas cavities clinging to the back of the impeller blades were observed. Both cases were also investigated with the use of three‐dimensional transient CFD simulations. For the single‐phase flow the simulations in the impeller region correspond very well with the experimental data. For the gas‐liquid flow both the mean and fluctuating liquid velocities in the impeller region are well predicted. This is also the case for the mean radial gas velocities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cjce.5450800406

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EQMOM implemented in OpenFOAM for two stirred tank reactors yields numerical results agreeing very well with experimental data of Deen et al. in axial and radial liquid velocity profiles, and fairly well in evolution of dissolved oxygen concentration.

    “Their numerical results agree very well with the experimental data of Deen et al. [331] in terms of axial and radial liquid velocity profiles, and fairly well with their experimental outcomes in terms of the evolution of dissolved oxygen concentration.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deen, N. G., Solberg, T., & Hjertager, B. H.
Affiliations
Aalborg University (DK)
Corresponding author
Deen, Niels G.
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-08
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 0008-4034 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-019X
OpenAlex
W2111650206
Cited by
112
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps
Keywords
Rushton turbine, gas-liquid two-phase flow, wake vortices, gas cavities, impeller wake, turbulent flow, two-phase flow, 3D CFD simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review