Cited by 50Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringECG Monitoring and AnalysisCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Role of wearable rhythm recordings in clinical decision making—The wEHRAbles project

Open access
Manninger, Martin, Kosiuk, Jedrzej, Zweiker, David, Njeim, Mario, Antolic, Bor, Kircanski, Bratislav, Larsen, Jacob M., Svennberg, Emma +2 more·2020·Clinical Cardiology

Abstract

Background: Multiple wearable devices for rhythm analysis have been developed using either photoplethysmography (PPG) or handheld ECG. Hypothesis: The aim of this survey was to assess impact of these technologies on physicians' clinical decision‐making regarding initiation of diagnostic steps, drug therapy, and invasive strategies. Methods: The online survey included 10 questions on types of devices, advantages, and disadvantages of wearable devices as well as case scenarios for patients with supraventricular arrhythmias and atrial fibrillation (AF). Results: A total of 417 physicians (median age 37 [IQR 32‐43] years) from 42 countries world‐wide completed the survey. When presented a tracing of a regular tachycardia by a symptomatic patient, most participants would trigger further diagnostic steps (90% for single‐lead ECG vs 83% for PPG, P < .001), while a single‐lead ECG would be sufficient to perform an invasive EP study in approximately half of participants (51% vs 22% for PPG, P < .001). When presented with a single‐lead ECG tracing suggesting AF, most participants (90%) would trigger further diagnostic steps. A symptomatic AF patient would trigger anticoagulation treatment to a higher extent as an asymptomatic patient (59% vs 21%, P < .001). PPG tracings would only rarely lead to therapeutic steps regardless of symptoms. Most participants would like scientific society recommendations on the use of wearable devices (62%). Conclusions: Tracings from wearable rhythm devices suggestive of arrhythmias are most likely to trigger further diagnostic steps, and in the case of PPG recordings rarely therapeutic interventions. A majority of participants expect these devices to facilitate diagnostics and arrhythmia screening but fear data overload and expect scientific society recommendations on the use of wearables.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/clc.23404

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is most likely that, when used in clinical practice, PPG-based devices could prompt ECG-based assessment when possible AF is detected, rather than being used for decision making on their own.

    “It is most likely that, when used in clinical practice, PPG-based devices could prompt ECG-based assessment when possible AF is detected, rather than being used for decision making on their own”

    From Wearable Photoplethysmography for Cardiovascular Monitoring (2022) · cites this paper as [202]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manninger, M., Kosiuk, J., Zweiker, D., Njeim, M., Antolic, B., Kircanski, B., Larsen, J. M., Svennberg, E., Vanduynhoven, P., & Duncker, D.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
  • Helios Clinic Koethen Germany
  • Saint Joseph University (LB)
  • University Medical Centre Ljubljana Department of Cardiology Ljubljana Slovenia
  • Clinical Centre of Serbia Pacemaker Centre Belgrade Serbia
  • Aalborg University Hospital (DK)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital (BE)
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
Corresponding author
Duncker, David
Venue
Clinical Cardiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-22
Volume
43
Issue
9
Pages
1032-1039
ISSN
  • 0160-9289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-8737
OpenAlex
W3044085570
Cited by
50
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cardiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Open Access Publication Fund)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
wearable devices, photoplethysmography, clinical decision-making, supraventricular arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, arrhythmia screening, anticoagulation, invasive electrophysiology, physician perceptions, data overload
MeSH terms
Clinical Decision-Making, Wearable Electronic Devices, Action Potentials, Adult, Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Heart Conduction System, Heart Rate, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Tachycardia, Supraventricular, Reproducibility of Results, Photoplethysmography, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review