Cited by 1,917Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesECG Monitoring and Analysis

Large-Scale Assessment of a Smartwatch to Identify Atrial Fibrillation

Open access
Perez, Marco V., Mahaffey, Kenneth W., Hedlin, Haley, Rumsfeld, John S., Garcia, Ariadna, Ferris, Todd, Balasubramanian, Vidhya, Russo, Andrea M. +14 more·2019·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optical sensors on wearable devices can detect irregular pulses. The ability of a smartwatch application (app) to identify atrial fibrillation during typical use is unknown. METHODS: Participants without atrial fibrillation (as reported by the participants themselves) used a smartphone (Apple iPhone) app to consent to monitoring. If a smartwatch-based irregular pulse notification algorithm identified possible atrial fibrillation, a telemedicine visit was initiated and an electrocardiography (ECG) patch was mailed to the participant, to be worn for up to 7 days. Surveys were administered 90 days after notification of the irregular pulse and at the end of the study. The main objectives were to estimate the proportion of notified participants with atrial fibrillation shown on an ECG patch and the positive predictive value of irregular pulse intervals with a targeted confidence interval width of 0.10. RESULTS: We recruited 419,297 participants over 8 months. Over a median of 117 days of monitoring, 2161 participants (0.52%) received notifications of irregular pulse. Among the 450 participants who returned ECG patches containing data that could be analyzed - which had been applied, on average, 13 days after notification - atrial fibrillation was present in 34% (97.5% confidence interval [CI], 29 to 39) overall and in 35% (97.5% CI, 27 to 43) of participants 65 years of age or older. Among participants who were notified of an irregular pulse, the positive predictive value was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.92) for observing atrial fibrillation on the ECG simultaneously with a subsequent irregular pulse notification and 0.71 (97.5% CI, 0.69 to 0.74) for observing atrial fibrillation on the ECG simultaneously with a subsequent irregular tachogram. Of 1376 notified participants who returned a 90-day survey, 57% contacted health care providers outside the study. There were no reports of serious app-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of receiving an irregular pulse notification was low. Among participants who received notification of an irregular pulse, 34% had atrial fibrillation on subsequent ECG patch readings and 84% of notifications were concordant with atrial fibrillation. This siteless (no on-site visits were required for the participants), pragmatic study design provides a foundation for large-scale pragmatic studies in which outcomes or adherence can be reliably assessed with user-owned devices. (Funded by Apple; Apple Heart Study ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03335800.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1901183

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Arrhythmia detection algorithms such as the irregular pulse notification in the Apple Heart Study remained robust, with sensitivity for atrial fibrillation unaffected by skin tone across a large-scale population.

    “Importantly, arrhythmia detection algorithms such as the irregular pulse notification in the Apple Heart Study (Perez et al., 2019) remained robust, with sensitivity for atrial fibrillation unaffected by skin tone across a large-scale population [15].”

    From Photoplethysmography in Diverse Skin Tones: Evaluating Bias in Smartwatch Health Monitoring (2025) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Discussion reports that the Apple Heart Study enrolled 419,297 participants and that 84% of subsequent notifications among participants who returned an ECG patch were concordant with atrial fibrillation. But it explicitly says the study was not designed to measure sensitivity, and our copy reports no analysis showing sensitivity was unaffected by skin tone. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent large-scale longitudinal studies have shown promise in leveraging wearable sensor data for health monitoring and prediction.

    “While recent large-scale longitudinal studies have shown promise in leveraging wearable sensor data for health monitoring and prediction, they also introduce new challenges for data modelling.”
  • PPG tachograms, especially when augmented by single-lead ECG, can identify arrhythmias.

    “PPG tachograms, especially when augmented by single-lead ECG, can also identify arrhythmias19.”
  • Atrial fibrillation screening through PPG has shown variable accuracy depending on the algorithms and devices used.

    “AF screening through PPG has shown variable accuracy depending on the algorithms and devices used19,51,52”
  • In the Apple Heart study, the positive predictive value for AF detection was 84% for the irregular notification algorithm and 71% for individual tachograms.

    “The positive predictive value for AF detection was 84% and 71% for the irregular notification algorithm and individual tachograms, respectively19.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perez, M. V., Mahaffey, K. W., Hedlin, H., Rumsfeld, J. S., Garcia, A., Ferris, T., Balasubramanian, V., Russo, A. M., Rajmane, A., Cheung, L., Hung, G., Lee, J., Kowey, P., Talati, N., Nag, D., Gummidipundi, S. E., Beatty, A., Hills, M. T., Desai, S., Granger, C. B., Desai, M., & Turakhia, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (M.V.P.), Stanford Center for Clinical Research (K.W.M., A.R., N.T.), the Quantitative Sciences Unit (H.H., A.G., V.B., J.L., S.E.G., M.D.), Information Resources and Technology (T.F., G.H.), Department of Medicine (S.D.), and the Center for Digital Health (M.P.T.), Stanford University, Stanford, Apple, Cupertino (L.C., D.N., A.B., S.D.), and the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto (M.P.T.) — all in California; the University of...
  • Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (US)
  • Lankenau Heart Institute (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2019-11-14
Volume
381
Issue
20
Pages
1909-1917
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2987985090
Cited by
1,917
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 263 · 2025: 300 · 2024: 259 · 2023: 276 · 2022: 271 · 2021: 304 · 2020: 228 · 2019: 12 · 2016: 1
FWCI
71.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Stanford University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, smartwatches, wearable devices, optical pulse detection, positive predictive value, ECG patch, telemedicine, mobile application, health care utilization, older adults, adverse events, participant satisfaction, participant burden, participant retention, participant recruitment
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Atrial Fibrillation, Confidentiality, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Telemedicine, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review