Cited by 56Infection Control and VentilationIndoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureCOVID-19 impact on air quality

Impact of Health on Particle Size of Exhaled Respiratory Aerosols: Case‐control Study

Open access
Hersen, Guillaume, Moularat, Stéphane, Robine, Enric, Géhin, Evelyne, Corbet, Sandrine, Vabret, Astrid, Freymuth, François·2008·CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water

Abstract

Abstract Individuals with viral infection could possibly emit an infectious aerosol. The distinction between exhaled breaths of infected and healthy individuals should facilitate an understanding of the airborne transmission of infections. In this context, the present study is aimed at distinguishing healthy individuals from symptomatic ones by the study of their exhaled breath. A setup composed of a modified hood connected to an electrical low pressure impactor, which allows for the study of a wide range of particle sizes (from 7 nm to 10 μm), has been developed in order to collect exhaled breaths. This setup has been used with seventy eight volunteers. The results obtained using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showed that exhaled breaths of individuals without symptoms have statistical similarities and are different from those of individuals with symptoms. This separation was made by the greater proportional emission by individuals with symptoms of particles collected on stages 3 (D50 = 0.09 μm), 6 (D50 = 0.38 μm), 8 (D50 = 0.95 μm), 10 (D50 = 2.40 μm), and 12 (D50 = 4.02 μm) of the impactor. There was not a specific size distribution obtained for the individuals with symptoms. As a consequence, further research on the exhaled breath should be undertaken with symptomatic volunteers and would require the analysis of this wide range of particle sizes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/clen.200700189

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hersen, G., Moularat, S., Robine, E., Géhin, E., Corbet, S., Vabret, A., & Freymuth, F.
Affiliations
  • Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment (FR)
  • Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie (FR)
Corresponding author
Robine, Enric
Venue
CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07
Volume
36
Issue
7
Pages
572-577
ISSN
  • 1863-0650 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-0669
OpenAlex
W2085443550
Cited by
56
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CLEAN - Soil Air Water (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › COVID-19 impact on air quality
Keywords
particle size distribution, viral infection, airborne transmission, symptomatic individuals, low pressure impactor, respiratory health, infectious aerosols

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review