The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Buckling of a single microtubule by optical trapping forces: Direct measurement of microtubule rigidity
Abstract
As major determinants of cell shape and polarity, microtubules are required to have suitable rigidity. However, our knowledge of the mechanical properties of microtubules is far from satisfactory. We report here a new method of measuring the flexural rigidity of a single microtubule by direct buckling using the optical trapping technique. Microtubule buckling was induced by applying a small longitudinal compressing force through an optically trapped microsphere that was firmly attached to the microtubule. Three ways of estimating the flexural rigidity of a continuous slender rod, one from the observed critical load of buckling and two from deflected lengths and angles of bending, yielded values which agreed well when applied to the analysis of buckling microtubules. Unexpectedly, we found that the rigidity was not constant as expected but was dependent on microtubule length. This length dependency explains the discrepancies among reported values of microtubule flexural rigidity measured by different methods. Comparing microtubules of identical lengths, microtubules assembled with brain‐derived associated proteins (4 × 10−23 Nm 2 at around 10 m̈m in length) were four times more rigid than those assembled from purified tubulin and stabilized with taxol (1 × 10−23 Nm 2). © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kis, A., Kasas, S., Babić, B., Kulik, A. J., Benoît, W., Briggs, G. A. D., Schönenberger, C., Catsicas, S., & Forró, L. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.248101 · Cited by 353
Microtubules self-repair in response to mechanical stress
Schaedel, L., John, K., Gaillard, J., Nachury, M. V., Blanchoin, L., & Théry, M. (2015) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4396 · Cited by 294
How Taxol® stabilises microtubule structure
Amos, L. A., & Löwe, J. (1999) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/s1074-5521(99)89002-4 · Cited by 248
(2000) · PubMed · Cited by 23
Inferring spatially varying bending stiffness of biopolymers with deep-learning approach
Hong, C., Lim, C., Oh, J., Lee, J.-B., Jeong, E. E., Yoo, J.-Y., Kim, W. K., & Jeon, J.-H. (2025) · Machine Learning: Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ae1a35
Metadata
- Authors
- Kurachi, M., Hoshi, M., & Tashiro, H.
- Venue
- Cell Motility
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 221-228
- ISSN
- 0886-1544 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113579203
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Buckling of a single microtubule by optical trapping forces: Direct measurement of microtubule rigidity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cm.970300306
- The paper
- Kurachi, M., Hoshi, M., & Tashiro, H. (1995). Buckling of a single microtubule by optical trapping forces: Direct measurement of microtubule rigidity. Cell Motility. https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.970300306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.