Cited by 44Ovarian function and disordersParticipatory Visual Research MethodsReproductive Health and Technologies

A snapshot of the lives of women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A photovoice investigation

Open access
Williams, Sophie, Sheffield, David, Knibb, Rebecca C·2016·Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome affects 6 percent of women. Symptoms include hirsutism, acne, and infertility. This research explores the impact of polycystic ovary syndrome on women’s lives using photovoice. Nine participants photographed objects related to their quality of life and made diary entries explaining each photograph. Three themes emerged from thematic analysis of the diaries: control (of symptoms and polycystic ovary syndrome controlling their lives), perception (of self, others, and their situation), and support (from relationships, health care systems, and education). These findings illuminate positive aspects of living with polycystic ovary syndrome and the role pets and social networking sites play in providing support for women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1359105314547941

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nine included papers report on patients' own preferences, views, and experiences of the IoT for PCOS-related reasons.

    “Nine included papers report on patients’ own preferences, views, and experiences of the IoT for PCOS-related reasons [17,44,45,97,98,99,100,101,102] (Supplementary File S4).”
  • Publication dates of participant voices papers ranged from 2007 to 2023, with the majority from Australia (n = 6), two from the UK, and one from Canada.

    “The publication dates ranged from 2007 to 2023, with the majority originating from Australia (n = 6) [17,44,45,97,99,102], while two originated from the UK [100,101], and one from Canada [98].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, S., Sheffield, D., & Knibb, R. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Derby (GB)
  • Aston University (GB)
Corresponding author
Williams, Sophie
Venue
Journal of Health Psychology
Published
2014-09-09
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
1170-1182
ISSN
  • 1359-1053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7277
OpenAlex
W2003254352
Cited by
44
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, women's experiences, quality of life, symptom management, social support, PET, social networking sites, infertility, hirsutism, health care access, self-perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Photography, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Quality of Life, Health Behavior, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review