Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 446

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Monoclonal antibodies to target epidermal growth factor receptor–positive tumors: A new paradigm for cancer therapy

Open access
Herbst, Roy S., Shin, Dong M.·2002·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional cytotoxic approaches to tumor management are associated with efficacy and toxicity limitations. Blockade of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its ligands is a novel approach to the treatment of human tumors that offers a noncytotoxic alternative to cancer treatment. METHODS: An English‐language literature search was conducted to identify studies assessing the in vitro and in vivo effects of EGFR blockade with an emphasis on approaches that use monoclonal antibody therapy. RESULTS: The EGF pathway regulates normal cellular processes and appears to be correlated with the development of malignancy. Approximately 30% of human tumors express EGFR, which has been reported to be correlated with poor prognosis and diminished disease‐free and overall survival in selected tumor types. A number of anti‐EGFR monoclonal antibodies have been developed, which currently are undergoing clinical trials in humans. Effective anti‐EGFR monoclonal antibodies compete with endogenous ligands, primarily EGF and transforming growth factor–α, for receptor ligand‐binding sites. Binding to EGFR blocks critical signaling pathways and interferes with the growth of tumors expressing EGFR. Anti‐EGFR monoclonal antibodies that currently are under study include IMC‐C225, EMD 55900, ICR 62, and ABX‐EGF. CONCLUSIONS: These antibodies have demonstrated promising results and appear to have been well tolerated. EGFR‐targeted therapy addresses important, unmet needs in the treatment of human tumors, particularly EGFR‐positive epithelial tumors including common malignancies of the head and neck, lung, and colon. Cancer 2002;94:1593–611. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10372

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.10372

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 446

Metadata

Authors
Herbst, R. S., & Shin, D. M.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-03
Volume
94
Issue
5
Pages
1593-1611
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2079286299
Cited by
446
References
1
FWCI
12.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monoclonal antibodies to target epidermal growth factor receptor–positive tumors: A new paradigm for cancer therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.10372
The paper
Herbst, R. S., & Shin, D. M. (2002). Monoclonal antibodies to target epidermal growth factor receptor–positive tumors: A new paradigm for cancer therapy. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10372

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.