The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: Results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding differences in cancer screening among population groups in 2000 and successes or failures in reducing disparities over time among groups is important for planning a public health strategy to reduce or eliminate health disparities, a major goal of Healthy People 2010 national cancer screening objectives. In 2000, the new cancer control module added to the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) collected more detailed information on cancer screening compared with previous surveys. METHODS: Data from the 2000 NHIS and earlier surveys were analyzed to discern patterns and trends in cancer screening practices, including Pap tests, mammography, prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening, and colorectal screening. The data are reported for population subgroups that were defined by a number of demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. RESULTS: Women who were least likely to have had a mammogram within the last 2 years were those with no usual source of health care (61%), women with no health insurance (67%), and women who immigrated to the United States within the last 10 years (61%). Results for Pap tests within the last 3 years were similar. Among both men and women, those least likely to have had a fecal occult blood test or endoscopy within the recommended screening interval had no usual source of care (14% for men and 18% for women), no health insurance (20% for men and 18% for women), or were recent immigrants (20% for men and 18% for women). An analysis of changes in test use since the 1987 survey indicates that the disparities are widening among groups with no usual source of care. CONCLUSIONS: No striking improvements have been observed for the groups with greatest need. Although screening use for most groups has increased since 1987, major disparities remain. Some groups, notably individuals with no usual source of care and the uninsured are falling further behind; and, according to the 2000 data, recent immigrants also experience a significant gap in screening utilization. More attention is needed to overcome screening barriers for these groups if the population benefits of cancer screening are to be achieved. Cancer 2003;97:1528–40. Published 2003 by the American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11208
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clegg, L. X., Reichman, M. E., Miller, B. A., Hankey, B. F., Singh, G. K., Lin, Y. D., Goodman, M. T., Lynch, C. F., Schwartz, S. M., Chen, V. W., et al. (2009) · Cancer Causes & Control · doi:10.1007/s10552-008-9256-0 · Cited by 835
Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population
Seeff, L. C., Nadel, M. R., Klabunde, C. N., Thompson, T., Shapiro, J. A., Vernon, S. W., & Coates, R. J. (2004) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.20276 · Cited by 538
Self-citationInternational epidemiology of prostate cancer: Geographical distribution and secular trends
Baade, P. D., Youlden, D. R., & Krnjacki, L. J. (2009) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.200700511 · Cited by 444
Johnson, C. E., Mues, K. E., Mayne, S. L., & Kiblawi, A. N. (2008) · Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease · doi:10.1097/lgt.0b013e31815d8d88 · Cited by 310
Reported drop in mammography: Is this cause for concern?
Breen, N., A. Cronin, K., Meissner, H. I., Taplin, S. H., Tangka, F. K., Tiro, J. A., & McNeel, T. S. (2007) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.22723 · Cited by 198
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Swan, J., Breen, N., Coates, R. J., Rimer, B. K., & Lee, N. C.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03-03
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1528-1540
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W1989421209
- Cited by
- 767
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: Results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.11208
- The paper
- Swan, J., Breen, N., Coates, R. J., Rimer, B. K., & Lee, N. C. (2003). Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: Results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.