The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prognostic factors for patients with localized soft‐tissue sarcoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy: An analysis of 1225 patients
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prognostic factors for patients with soft‐tissue sarcoma who are treated with conservative surgery and radiation are documented poorly. METHODS: The clinicopathologic features and disease outcome for 1225 patients with localized sarcoma who were treated with conservative surgery and radiation were reviewed retrospectively. Actuarial univariate and multivariate statistical methods were used to determine significant prognostic factors for local control, metastatic recurrence, and disease specific survival. RESULTS: The median follow‐up of surviving patients was 9.5 years. The respective local control rates at 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years were 83%, 80%, and 79%. Factors predictive of local recurrence were positive or uncertain resection margins; tumors located in the head and neck and the deep trunk; presentation with local recurrence; patient age > 64 years; malignant fibrous histiocytoma, neurogenic sarcoma. or epithelioid sarcoma histopathology; tumor measuring > 10 cm in greatest dimension; and high pathologic grade. Freedom from metastasis at 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years was 71%, 68%, and 66%, respectively. Factors that were predictive of metastatic recurrence were high tumor grade; large tumor size (> 5 cm); and leiomyosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, or epithelioid sarcoma. The respective disease specific survival rates at 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years were 73%, 68%, and 65%. Adverse factors for disease specific survival were high tumor grade; large tumor size (> 5 cm); tumors located in the head and neck and deep trunk; rhabdomyosarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma, or clear cell sarcoma; patient age > 64 years; and positive or uncertain resection margins. CONCLUSIONS: Soft‐tissue sarcoma comprises a heterogeneous group of diseases. Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastatic recurrence, lymph node recurrence, disease free survival, and disease specific survival are different, and optimal treatment strategies need to take this complexity into account. Cancer 2003;10:2530–43. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11365
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Classification And Regression Trees
Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (2017) · doi:10.1201/9781315139470 · Cited by 11,417
Cited by
Pervaiz, N., Colterjohn, N., Farrokhyar, F., Tozer, R., Figueredo, A., & Ghert, M. (2008) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.23592 · Cited by 987
Genotyping of circulating cell-free DNA enables noninvasive tumor detection in myxoid liposarcomas
Braig, D., Becherer, C., Bickert, C., Braig, M., Claus, R., Eisenhardt, A. E., Heinz, J., Scholber, J., Herget, G. W., Bronsert, P., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.32216 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Zagars, G. K., Ballo, M. T., Pisters, P. W. T., Pollock, R. E., Patel, S. R., Benjamin, R. S., & Evans, H. L.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-04-30
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2530-2543
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2075485315
- Cited by
- 681
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic factors for patients with localized soft‐tissue sarcoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy: An analysis of 1225 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.11365
- The paper
- Zagars, G. K., Ballo, M. T., Pisters, P. W. T., Pollock, R. E., Patel, S. R., Benjamin, R. S., & Evans, H. L. (2003). Prognostic factors for patients with localized soft‐tissue sarcoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy: An analysis of 1225 patients. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11365
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.