Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 987

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A systematic meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for localized resectable soft‐tissue sarcoma

Pervaiz, Nabeel, Colterjohn, Nigel, Farrokhyar, Forough, Tozer, Richard, Figueredo, Alvaro, Ghert, Michelle·2008·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND.: The use of adjuvant chemotherapy to treat adults with localized resectable soft‐tissue sarcoma remains controversial. The objective of this systematic review was to update the 1997 meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to reassess the efficacy of doxorubicin‐based chemotherapy with respect to recurrence and survival. METHODS.: A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify RCTs of adjuvant chemotherapy for adult patients diagnosed with localized resectable soft‐tissue sarcoma. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and quality of the studies using a modified version of the Detsky Quality Scale. The outcome measures were local, distant, and overall recurrence and survival calculated through the fixed effect or random effect model. RESULTS.: Four new eligible trials were identified allowing for a total of 18 trials representing 1953 patients to be included in the analysis. The odds ratios (OR) for local recurrence was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56‐0.94; P = .02) in favor of chemotherapy. For distant and overall recurrence the OR was 0.67 (95% CI 0.56‐0.82; P = .0001) in favor of chemotherapy. In terms of survival, doxorubicin alone had an OR of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.68‐1.03; P = .09), which as not statistically significant. However, the OR for doxorubicin combined with ifosfamide was 0.56 (95% CI, 0.36‐0.85; P = .01) in favor of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS.: This updated meta‐analysis confirms the marginal efficacy of chemotherapy in localized resectable soft‐tissue sarcoma with respect to local recurrence, distant recurrence, overall recurrence, and overall survival. These benefits are further improved with the addition of ifosfamide to doxorubicin‐based regimens, but must be weighed against associated toxicities. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.23592

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 987

Metadata

Authors
Pervaiz, N., Colterjohn, N., Farrokhyar, F., Tozer, R., Figueredo, A., & Ghert, M.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-06-02
Volume
113
Issue
3
Pages
573-581
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2067787818
Cited by
987
References
14
FWCI
28.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for localized resectable soft‐tissue sarcoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.23592
The paper
Pervaiz, N., Colterjohn, N., Farrokhyar, F., Tozer, R., Figueredo, A., & Ghert, M. (2008). A systematic meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for localized resectable soft‐tissue sarcoma. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23592

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.